Defending the Truth

Nothing bothers liberals more than the truth. In my experience, the simplest explanation is almost always the truest. The way I see it, there are three kinds of liberals, the sincere liberals, the insincere liberals, and the ignorant liberals.

The Sincere Liberals
It’s become the rage on conservative blogs to post pictures of liberal donks preening, masquerading, protesting, and generally making absolute imbeciles out of themselves. However wrong these individuals are, they are sincere in their wrongness. They honestly believe in their backward agendas and socialist policies. They march to the beat of an angry anti-American drum and they’re not shy about screeching their dissent. They are pro-abortion fem-Nazis, socialists, communists, hippies, Hollywood elites, and environmentalists. A good example of this kind of liberal is Janeane Garofalo. She absolutely believes every foul, craven, absurd word that comes out of her liberal mouth.

The Insincere Liberals
In my opinion, these are the most dangerous of the three types of liberals. The insincere liberal uses liberal policies as a device to protest or counter conservative politics. Liberal policies are entrenched in Stalinist principles and encourage class envy. Insincere liberals use class envy to pit one group against another and therefore find support amongst the poor, uneducated, outcast, and vulnerable of society. The Democratic Party is fraught with insincere liberals. They know that their policies are outdated, unrealistic, and hopeless. They are fully aware that, in the end, their liberal policies will harm those they promise to protect. Only one thing motivates an insincere liberal, absolute power. Most civil rights leaders are also insincere liberals. They continue to find racism and bigotry where it does not exist simply to maintain their own relevance. The list of insincere liberals is endless. Harry Reid, John Kerry, Ted Kennedy, and Jesse Jackson are obstructionist insincere liberals of the most shameless and deceitful nature. They are liars, bent on raising issues, obstructing justice, and inciting conflict to gain political leverage.

The Ignorant Liberals
This group, while not the loudest or scariest, is by far the most numerous and most damaging of the three. Ignorant liberals are everyday people who gallivant through life enjoying the freedoms made possible by the sacrifices of thousands of brave American Soldiers. If you ask them about their position on a specific issue, they will often answer but will have very little in terms of an actual explanation of their conclusion. The ignorant liberal is a tool for the insincere liberal. They are spoon fed their news and they think with their heart. When forced to have an opinion, they are easily swayed by typical liberal tactics that play on humanity’s emotions, fears, wants, and sympathies. They are complacent and willing to let others make decisions for them. With all of the modern creature comforts that we enjoy in the United States, ignorant liberals are apathetic and pay little attention to issues that decide the future of their freedoms and lifestyles. The ignorant liberal is fodder for the insincere liberal and the sincere liberal. They are vast tides of humanity sloshing within the republic and threatening to allow the insincere liberals to drown our freedoms forever.

Hi Bull,

Your use of ad hominem suits you...

Oh Dear

Original source: Cocked and Locked: Three Kinds of Liberals
Nice bit of plagiarism you've performed here...


Beyond the name-calling, it's pretty much devoid of an argument.

Quite frankly, somebody could take this text and insert "conservative" in place of "liberal", change a bit of the text for a slur on the other side of the fence, and it sounds just as "good"...

Some wine-coolers and a lifesize pin-up of Anne Coulter would do nicely right about now...

OD

Heck yeah. I'd go for that. She's a pretty smart gal and she knows how to to shoot.

Naked?

Speaking of Ann Coulter getting naked..........

Ann Coulter Poses Nude for Esquire

foundit66 : Sure not hard for me to tell the difference. As a conservative
I'm pro-American and completely for tighter security at the borders, penalties for businesses that hire illegal aliens, against giving driver's licenses and in-state tuition to illegal aliens, and for immediate deportation of any illegal alien detected or arrested, unless they're in asylum proceedings. I'm adamantly opposed to giving Social Security benefits to illegals, opposed to ballots in the U. S. being printed in any language other than English

alias I will have to get me a copy of Esquire.

Some would consider me a "liberal", although I think those people are just blind.

I am more moderate, and I support everything you just said regarding illegal aliens.

Regarding "pro-American", I'm a little more hesitant to say that because I've seen too many people use that phrase as a blind endorsement of American policy. I question it to ensure that we are not adopting a policy half-cocked.
I support some of American policy. War on Afghanistan for example.
I question and oppose other aspects of American policy. The war in Iraq needs vigorous analysis and discussion. Social security does need an overhaul.

As far as your homo agenda, you're a classic new age progressive liberal.