Obviously, even simple analogies go over your head.

Do you disagree with my assessment of some right-wingers being "mean"?
Yes or no.

Cause if you can't even take a stand on the issue, then what good are you?

It all depends what you mean by "mean".

And apparently you don't know what you mean by "mean".

No. It doesn't.

If you make a statement, I don't wait to understand everything you say about the individual word meanings before I can figure out if I agree.

You KNOW you CANNOT DEFEND opposing my simple assessment of the situation, so instead you go for playing really, really stupid.


Like I said, I do know what I mean.
You are the only one having problems.

How stupid does one (meaning you gar, since I obviously have to spell it out for you) have to be to not comprehend what is meant by "mean"?

For the love of gawd. Pick up a dictionary if you can't figure it out...

I imagine your head is spinning. Think outside the box. The (hate) email was from one on the left to one on the right. Still confused? Read it several times.

The school had a speech code" which forbade anyone from saying anything about homosexuals and anything else the Left embraces. The students for the speech code are upset because Ruth Malhotra defeated the speech code in federal court. Then, the lovers of the speech code say they would like to rape and beat the person (Ruth) who got the code overthrown. So much for "tolerance". I know it's hard for you to see. It always is for the Left. It's like they've got their head so far up their a$$ they believe in their heart of hearts that they're smelling brownies.

It's about people on the Left being intolerance but expecting to be treated with tolerance. Basically what happened, the tables got flipped and they didn't like it.

Very well put

This is exactly the message I have been evangelising for years

THAT we get.
It's what you're about to say next which makes no sense...


I highlighted your error, which you continue to make.
You admit this was done "from one on the left", but then you turn around and pretend it was MORE than just one person who was talking about "raping and beating the person (Ruth)".

It was ONE PERSON.
That's it.


What's really stupid in all this is your incapability to understand what the REAL problem we are talking about with regards to the article.
I EXPLICITLY said that whatever INDIVIDUAL wrote this e-mail was wrong.
But it is NOT reflective of the entire "left".

That's just stupid.
And it's dumb that this is the second time I've had to explain this...