Defending the Truth
Earth
Click here for free registeration..
Quick Search
11/23/07 - Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!

Go Back   Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gun Control
Gun Control Debate and defend whether or not you believe that the second amendment protects individual rights to bear arms.

Reply
 
LinkBack (2) Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-11-2007, 03:26 AM   #51 (permalink)
Villiage Idiot
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 943, Level: 16
Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16
Level up: 17%, 57 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
So do you advocate vigilante justice in preference to the Rule of Law?
No I'm a big fan of the idea of laws, especially ones that have a proper moral basis, ie, all decent and law abiding citizens should be allowed to protect themselves, their loved ones, and their property at ALL times.....we could extend this to the community in general as well.

As was already mentioned in this thread, if you shoot someone and merely wound them, they might decide to exact revenge, so whilst it seems excessive to shoot to kill, it might actually be the safer option.....having said that, I'm not sure I'd shoot someone who stole my old pushbike.

Sticking up for antiquated or inadequate law is morally objectionable…..and remember, the law is “just a piece of god damned paper”, in reality, there’s you and the other dude, and if both of you abide by basic moral laws, then neither of you should need to exercise extreme measures.

FYI, I believe society should be overhauled, and I think someone like Ron Paul would be a great initial option, however, I’m someone who believes in objective ethics, so ideally, society will eventually get round to implementing them, but I’m not counting on it.
DavidHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 04:26 AM   #52 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 599, Level: 11
Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11
Level up: 12%, 1 Points needed
Level up: 12% Level up: 12% Level up: 12%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
So do you advocate vigilante justice in preference to the Rule of Law?
Rule of Law is only a fancy way of saying moral authority, by doing what is right. Please quality what is the basis for what you consider right from wrong.
Jenifer Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 07:23 AM   #53 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 653
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 9 Posts

Points: 4,193, Level: 41
Points: 4,193, Level: 41 Points: 4,193, Level: 41 Points: 4,193, Level: 41
Level up: 42%, 157 Points needed
Level up: 42% Level up: 42% Level up: 42%
Activity: 3%
Activity: 3% Activity: 3% Activity: 3%


They moved...
indago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 08:43 AM   #54 (permalink)
SIMPLETON
 
fxashun's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In my skin
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,477
Thanks: 112
Thanked 166 Times in 144 Posts

Points: 20,335, Level: 89
Points: 20,335, Level: 89 Points: 20,335, Level: 89 Points: 20,335, Level: 89
Level up: 90%, 15 Points needed
Level up: 90% Level up: 90% Level up: 90%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jenifer Johnson View Post
Rule of Law is only a fancy way of saying moral authority, by doing what is right. Please quality what is the basis for what you consider right from wrong.
Why don't you go first? You know, so we'll know how you feel about things...
__________________
fxashun is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 11:21 AM   #55 (permalink)
Citizen
 
mr_incredibly_cool_017's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Durham NC
Gender: Male
Posts: 60
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 391, Level: 7
Points: 391, Level: 7 Points: 391, Level: 7 Points: 391, Level: 7
Level up: 8%, 9 Points needed
Level up: 8% Level up: 8% Level up: 8%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Well in Texas, if you break into someone's home, the home owner does have the right to shoot you. Maybe this law played a role in the reason he wasn't chargewd.
mr_incredibly_cool_017 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 04:15 PM   #56 (permalink)
Villiage Idiot
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 943, Level: 16
Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16
Level up: 17%, 57 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by fxashun View Post
Why don't you go first? You know, so we'll know how you feel about things...
Stop being such an A-Hole
DavidHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 04:49 PM   #57 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
Country:

Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 369
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post

Points: 1,247, Level: 19
Points: 1,247, Level: 19 Points: 1,247, Level: 19 Points: 1,247, Level: 19
Level up: 20%, 53 Points needed
Level up: 20% Level up: 20% Level up: 20%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by garysher View Post
So do you advocate vigilante justice in preference to the Rule of Law?
The answe4r is no. People get all up in your face about the rule of law when somone suggests we just let illegal immigrants stay because well its a better alternative then the 93 billion dollars and the 100 years it will take to find the people currently here...the detractors of such an idea rattle on about the Rule of Law..without understanding what the concept really means but thats another argument.

The guy did the wrong thing. You only get to shoot people if you have a clear and present danger. Leaving your house after a police despatcher had told you to stay inside your house is not a clear and present danger but putting your own life in danger and it could be argued committing a crime whilst another crime was in progress ...falls under the concept of Felony murder.

You also have to met force with like force. If the guy confronts people and they have a tire iron using a gun is a disproportional reaction.

Vigilante justice undermines the foundation of our society and should never be tolerated. I don't care what the other 2 did or had done. The guy is not a hero but just as bad as the 2 guys stealing from his neighbor. It doesn't mean the 2 men that he killed aren't complete cretins either it just means we have a legal system, the police had been called and that is the end of the story. The guy murdered two people its that simple. His property was not in danger, he was not personally in danger, he wasn't even afraid because he left his home, if he was in fear he'd of stayed inside following the advice of the depatcher but instead he left his home after being told to stay inside by a person employed by the police to give advice in such instances (as well as dispatch police) and hunted them down.

Whats next its Ok to kill someone because you thought they looked like they may do something???

People got very exicted because these 2 are illegals with a criminal record its just that simple..same hysterical reactionary crap from the media... vigilante justice is never a good thing and should be treated with disdain and he should be charged.
Gadgetory is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 04:56 PM   #58 (permalink)
Partisan
 
garysher's Avatar
 
Country:

Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,279
Thanks: 92
Thanked 175 Times in 149 Posts

Points: 24,684, Level: 95
Points: 24,684, Level: 95 Points: 24,684, Level: 95 Points: 24,684, Level: 95
Level up: 96%, 666 Points needed
Level up: 96% Level up: 96% Level up: 96%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadgetory View Post
The answe4r is no. People get all up in your face about the rule of law when somone suggests we just let illegal immigrants stay because well its a better alternative then the 93 billion dollars and the 100 years it will take to find the people currently here...the detractors of such an idea rattle on about the Rule of Law..without understanding what the concept really means but thats another argument.

The guy did the wrong thing. You only get to shoot people if you have a clear and present danger. Leaving your house after a police despatcher had told you to stay inside your house is not a clear and present danger but putting your own life in danger and it could be argued committing a crime whilst another crime was in progress ...falls under the concept of Felony murder.

You also have to met force with like force. If the guy confronts people and they have a tire iron using a gun is a disproportional reaction.

Vigilante justice undermines the foundation of our society and should never be tolerated. I don't care what the other 2 did or had done. The guy is not a hero but just as bad as the 2 guys stealing from his neighbor. It doesn't mean the 2 men that he killed aren't complete cretins either it just means we have a legal system, the police had been called and that is the end of the story. The guy murdered two people its that simple. His property was not in danger, he was not personally in danger, he wasn't even afraid because he left his home, if he was in fear he'd of stayed inside following the advice of the depatcher but instead he left his home after being told to stay inside by a person employed by the police to give advice in such instances (as well as dispatch police) and hunted them down.

Whats next its Ok to kill someone because you thought they looked like they may do something???

People got very exicted because these 2 are illegals with a criminal record its just that simple..same hysterical reactionary crap from the media... vigilante justice is never a good thing and should be treated with disdain and he should be charged.
Good post gadget - you nailed it (for once!)
__________________

garysher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 05:03 PM   #59 (permalink)
Villiage Idiot
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Australia
Gender: Male
Posts: 145
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 943, Level: 16
Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16 Points: 943, Level: 16
Level up: 17%, 57 Points needed
Level up: 17% Level up: 17% Level up: 17%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadgetory View Post
.
vigilante justice is never a good thing and should be treated with disdain and he should be charged.

What we see here is someone who thinks that an inefficient police force is preferable to dealing with blatant criminals, also, the idea that a neighbour can’t protect the life and property of other neighbours simply means that no-one can, even the property owner, IOW, criminals can enter your property, waltz thru your bedroom/your kids bedroom with complete freedom…..and you’re not allowed to use a weapon of greater force than what the criminals have because it'll be EFFECTIVE, LOL.

You sound like a crim to me chump.
DavidHenry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2007, 05:17 PM   #60 (permalink)
Citizen
 
Country:

Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 174
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 599, Level: 11
Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11 Points: 599, Level: 11
Level up: 12%, 1 Points needed
Level up: 12% Level up: 12% Level up: 12%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gadgetory View Post
The guy did the wrong thing.
Since you used the term "wrong" thing, please quality what is the basis for what you consider right from wrong.

Since you and garysher are in agreement, but garysher wasn't able to articulate it for me, maybe you can.
Jenifer Johnson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://www.defendingthetruth.com/gun-control/15364-texan-shoots-burglars-cold-blood-no-charges-pressed.html
Posted By For Type Date
YouTube - Joe Horn kills two burglars - Hero or vigilante murderer ? This thread Refback 02-02-2008 12:43 AM
The Castle Doctrine: A State-by-State Summary « tekel This thread Refback 01-06-2008 01:36 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:44 PM.

DefendingTheTruth.com RSS2 Feed   Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!   Add to My MSN
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Created by: Jon-Kingsbury.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Proudly hosted by WireNine


Recommended Sites

Top Political Sites Poltical Topsites