Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gun Control
No more .50 Caliber Rifles?

Gun Control Debate and defend whether or not you believe that the second amendment protects individual rights to bear arms.

Reply
Page 3 of 14 < 12 3 4567891011121314 >
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-15-2005, 05:13 PM   #21 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
criticalprocess's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 228
Points: 3,752, Level: 38
Points: 3,752, Level: 38 Points: 3,752, Level: 38 Points: 3,752, Level: 38
Level up: 68%, 48 Points needed
Level up: 68% Level up: 68% Level up: 68%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
criticalprocess is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Private Pyle? Not a great choice for a hero if you ask me.
Sponsored Links
Old 06-15-2005, 08:29 PM   #22 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,352
Country:
Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by criticalprocess
Private Pyle? Not a great choice for a hero if you ask me.
I meant R. Lee Ermey fag...
Old 06-15-2005, 09:40 PM   #23 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
criticalprocess's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 228
Points: 3,752, Level: 38
Points: 3,752, Level: 38 Points: 3,752, Level: 38 Points: 3,752, Level: 38
Level up: 68%, 48 Points needed
Level up: 68% Level up: 68% Level up: 68%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
criticalprocess is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
well you do have Pyle's haircut. Thought it might be hero emulation.
Old 06-16-2005, 08:24 AM   #24 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,352
Country:
Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by criticalprocess
well you do have Pyle's haircut. Thought it might be hero emulation.
Well you've got... some other guy's... haircut... errr... You're stupid!
Old 01-12-2006, 11:10 AM   #25 (permalink)
Banned
 
DHard3006's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 109
Points: 2,297, Level: 28
Points: 2,297, Level: 28 Points: 2,297, Level: 28 Points: 2,297, Level: 28
Level up: 98%, 3 Points needed
Level up: 98% Level up: 98% Level up: 98%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
DHard3006 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Should any gun be banned just because of it's caliber?
No. Gun haters like all hate groups attack a right by chipping away at it. In this case one gun at a time. Before it was Saturday night specials, then assault weapons, now sniper rifles.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Aren't all Guns 'potentially dangerous weapons of terrorism'?
No. The terrorist are the problem not firearms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by tadpole256
Does any one believe that banning any guns makes the country at all safer, especially from terrorists?
No.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
I don't think the public should be allowed to own any form of weapon specifically designed to kill humans.
No gun to date has been built for this. No gun to date cannot think on it’s own to kill. No gun to date can operate without the direct input of a human.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MassHole
u don't need that much fire power for hunting
Gun hater double talk.
Quote:
Originally Posted by criticalprocess
I personally see no reason why an individual should need a .50 caliber weapon.
I can recall this phrase being used with the other guns the gun haters want to ban. Where does it stop? When all guns are banned.
Quote:
Originally Posted by criticalprocess
Some people say that banning these guns would infringe on the rights of hunters,
The 2nd amend is not about hunting. It clearly states it is about the right to bear arms only. In fact that is the only reason the 2nd amend gives to bear arms, it is a right.
Quote:
Originally Posted by criticalprocess
If there is a reason, and I just haven't seen it yet, then I want a cannon.
You have seen the reason but like all hate group members you just do not like it. The reason is the 2nd amend.
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilhippy
However I believe a .50 cal weapon has no purpose other than to plot evil deeds;
This gun like all guns cannot plot anything.
Quote:
Originally Posted by evilhippy
And if your hunting anything from a mile away your a bit of a coward to be honest.
Spoken like a true city liver that has more lights on at night then the stars in the sky.
Old 01-12-2006, 11:21 AM   #26 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,849
Country:
Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Level up: 91%, 98 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHard3006
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
I don't think the public should be allowed to own any form of weapon specifically designed to kill humans.
No gun to date has been built for this. No gun to date cannot think on it’s own to kill. No gun to date can operate without the direct input of a human.
The ol' guns don't kill people, people kill people bullshit. Guns don't die, people do.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 01-12-2006, 11:25 AM   #27 (permalink)
Banned
 
DHard3006's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 109
Points: 2,297, Level: 28
Points: 2,297, Level: 28 Points: 2,297, Level: 28 Points: 2,297, Level: 28
Level up: 98%, 3 Points needed
Level up: 98% Level up: 98% Level up: 98%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
DHard3006 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
The ol' guns don't kill people, people kill people bullshit.
No bullshit, just simple fact. Simple fact that gun haters like you cannot debunk.
Old 01-12-2006, 11:34 AM   #28 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,849
Country:
Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Level up: 91%, 98 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHard3006
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
The ol' guns don't kill people, people kill people bullshit.
No bullshit, just simple fact. Simple fact that gun haters like you cannot debunk.
Handguns and assualt weapons certainly weren't designed to hurt animals for hunting. What does that leave us with? Inanimate objects?

The logic breaks down in .02 seconds.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 01-12-2006, 02:24 PM   #29 (permalink)
Banned
 
DHard3006's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: AZ
Posts: 109
Points: 2,297, Level: 28
Points: 2,297, Level: 28 Points: 2,297, Level: 28 Points: 2,297, Level: 28
Level up: 98%, 3 Points needed
Level up: 98% Level up: 98% Level up: 98%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
DHard3006 is offline 		Reply With Quote
The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Handguns and assualt weapons certainly weren't designed to hurt animals for hunting.
Once again the 2nd amend is not about hunting. The 2nd amend is about your right to bear arms.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
What does that leave us with? Inanimate objects?
Sure does. You know kind of like rocks. Rocks are not designed for anything, they just lay around until a person decides to use them for something.
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
The logic breaks down in .02 seconds.
The gun hater logic sure does. You know the gun hater logic of blaming “ Inanimate objects” for the actions of the person using them.
Old 01-12-2006, 09:28 PM   #30 (permalink)
Website Owner
Administrator
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 5,502
Country:
Thanks: 12
Thanked 70 Times in 62 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is online now 		Reply With Quote
Re: The right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Quote:
Originally Posted by DHard3006
Once again the 2nd amend is not about hunting. The 2nd amend is about your right to bear arms.
That's right!
Networked Web Sites
Jon-Kingsbury.com
DefendingTheTruth
UML Forums
Reply
Page 3 of 14 < 12 3 4567891011121314 >

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Defending the Truth - FAQ - Rules - Contact Us - Donate - Archive - Top

 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites 

Recommended Sites