Defending the Truth

Hey gun hater go to any gun store and look around. The gun haters would have demanded long ago that all guns be banned if they were not protected by the 2nd amend..

Explain where in the 2nd amendment it allows citizens to own weapons? Considering only militias are mentioned in regards to bearing arms you don't have a leg to stand on.

Gee gun hater which part of the right of the people do you not understand?

The right of the people in the militia in which the sentence is pertaining to. Once again I highlight what the sentence is pertaining to for you:

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Not a well regulated citizen, a militia. You don't get to pick and choose. This isn't the bible after all. You Christian troll.

What are we going to cut steak with?? Gotta ban knives as well!

It's amazing how you keep assuming hypothetical scenarios prove anything...
The thing you don't seem to realize is that whatever "gun haters" are out there are countered by the "gun nuts", like the NRA, who do their damndest to lobby against any gun control laws that are brought forward.

It's not the second amendment which stops "gun haters". It's the money and the lobbyist of the NRA.
If you believe that the 2nd amendment is the issue stopping "gun haters", show me ANY COURT CASE where the courts used the 2nd amendment to overturn laws passed by "gun haters" on gun control.
Like your AWB issue. Can you show me any court ruling which has even hinted that the 2nd amendment makes AWB unconstitutional?

You bandy around phrases like "perversion" and "gun hater" like they actually help to formulate good counter-arguments instead of revealing your own limitations.
=============================================

And of course, you completely avoided this point again.
Go figure...

2) You repeatedly misrepresent me and the statements of the court.
Nobody is saying that there is a right to own weaponry that the military uses. Miller said nothing of the sort.

The way you cut and paste my response demonstrates that you are trying to misrepresent my clear statements. If you continue in arguing against things that aren't said, there is no point in trying to continue in a battle of wits with the unarmed.

But I'm betting dollars to doughnuts that you'll be making some stupid statement in the future about how "Miller" said something it clearly did not...

Well gun hater the 2nd amend does not say what you claim. Nowhere does the 2nd amend say a person must be in a militia to bear arms.
It simply states and this is the hard part for gun haters to comprehend “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed”.
Well gun hater you are the ones doing the picking and choosing. The gun haters claim the 2nd amend is a collective right while the other rights are individual rights. These words are used in some of the other rights the gun haters claim are individual rights. These words “the right of the people”.
Well gun hater you have been told toe simple fact that people can purchase guns right now. And have been doing this since this country was founded.
The only time a law is challenged is when gun haters like you pass bad laws that infringe on a right. Then it takes time to remove these bad laws.
The late AWB was not renewed for one reason. Many of the elected officials that voted for it were not returned to their office in the next election because they were voted out of office.
Well gun hater which group of people obey gun control laws? It is a simple question gun hater.

If you were right then explain why it would be necessary for militia to appear earlier in the sentence? Your point makes no sense.

Well gun hater I do claim to be able to read the minds of the founder fathers.

Enough said.