Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gun Control

Gun Control Debate and defend whether or not you believe that the second amendment protects individual rights to bear arms.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-09-2006, 05:15 PM   #51 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,849
Country:
Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Level up: 91%, 98 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
I think a drunk person behind the wheel of a car can cause quite a bit of damage. Do you blame the alchohol or the person?

There is no excuse for driving drunk.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Sponsored Links
Old 05-09-2006, 05:23 PM   #52 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
There is no excuse for driving drunk.
So, why do you blame guns? Maybe there's no excuse for irresponsible gun use.
Old 05-09-2006, 05:26 PM   #53 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
Hayling's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: British Columbia
Gender: Male
Posts: 254
Country:
Points: 2,280, Level: 28
Points: 2,280, Level: 28 Points: 2,280, Level: 28 Points: 2,280, Level: 28
Level up: 87%, 20 Points needed
Level up: 87% Level up: 87% Level up: 87%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Hayling is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Well here in Canada hand-guns are banned and it greatly reduces homicides and gun violence.
As I leave you with restless liars and dealers on the take
Old 05-09-2006, 05:36 PM   #54 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,849
Country:
Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Level up: 91%, 98 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hayling
Well here in Canada hand-guns are banned and it greatly reduces homicides and gun violence.
It would make all the sense in the world to do that in America too.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 05-09-2006, 05:39 PM   #55 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,849
Country:
Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Level up: 91%, 98 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dylan
So, why do you blame guns? Maybe there's no excuse for irresponsible gun use.

I blame guns because it makes this terribly violent action much too easy to perform and at a moments whim.

I think we at LEAST need to ban handguns.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 05-09-2006, 05:47 PM   #56 (permalink)
Council Member
 
Dylan's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,808
Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53 Points: 6,624, Level: 53
Level up: 37%, 126 Points needed
Level up: 37% Level up: 37% Level up: 37%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Dylan is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
I blame guns because it makes this terribly violent action much too easy to perform and at a moments whim.

I think we at LEAST need to ban handguns.
Well, maybe we should at least ban hard liquor too. It's the same thing.

Being drunk makes a person more likely to do something violent.
Old 05-09-2006, 05:51 PM   #57 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,680
Country:
Points: 14,414, Level: 77
Points: 14,414, Level: 77 Points: 14,414, Level: 77 Points: 14,414, Level: 77
Level up: 91%, 36 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 9%
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
hev, when our freedoms and constitution was established, it was the cheif understanding that the costs of freedoms were well understood and people should take responsibility for their own actions and misuse of such freedoms under the law. For instance, people may get offended as a result to people exercising their right under the first amendment, but that doesn't mean we should ban freedoms of speech just because they're harmful to certain peoples. Consequently, sure handguns are destructive, and I despise them too, but right now I would rather not see our freedoms hindered any further, especially in a time when enough freedoms and rights are being ended.

And Dylan, I agree. The consequences of alcohol and drugs are sometimes just as or more harmful than handguns.
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 05-09-2006, 05:57 PM   #58 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky
hev, when our freedoms and constitution was established, it was the cheif understanding that the costs of freedoms were well understood and people should take responsibility for their own actions and misuse of such freedoms under the law. For instance, people may get offended as a result to people exercising their right under the first amendment, but that doesn't mean we should ban freedoms of speech just because they're harmful to certain peoples. Consequently, sure handguns are destructive, and I despise them too, but right now I would rather not see our freedoms hindered any further, especially in a time when enough freedoms and rights are being ended.
And Dylan, I agree. The consequences of alcohol and drugs are sometimes just as or more harmful than handguns.
What do you think of something akin to "driver's licenses" for guns?

Ensure that the owner is knowledgeable. Allow for the revokation (temporary or permanent) of the gun ownership if egregious disregard for their safe use is found...

It would be more restrictive, but at the same time I think some efforts should be taken to ensure proper usage, storage, and safety.
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 05-09-2006, 07:46 PM   #59 (permalink)
Senator
 
Katczinsky's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Columbus, OH
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,680
Country:
Points: 14,414, Level: 77
Points: 14,414, Level: 77 Points: 14,414, Level: 77 Points: 14,414, Level: 77
Level up: 91%, 36 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 9%
Activity: 9% Activity: 9% Activity: 9%
Send a message via AIM to Katczinsky
Katczinsky is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Interesting idea, but isn't that concept basically already in place with the 5-day waiting period process?
"If you want to achieve peace of mind and happiness, then have faith; if you want to be a disciple of truth, then search" -- Friedrich Nietzsche

Economic Left/Right: -9.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Old 05-09-2006, 08:22 PM   #60 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,849
Country:
Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98 Points: 28,252, Level: 98
Level up: 91%, 98 Points needed
Level up: 91% Level up: 91% Level up: 91%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Katczinsky
hev, when our freedoms and constitution was established, it was the cheif understanding that the costs of freedoms were well understood and people should take responsibility for their own actions and misuse of such freedoms under the law. For instance, people may get offended as a result to people exercising their right under the first amendment, but that doesn't mean we should ban freedoms of speech just because they're harmful to certain peoples. Consequently, sure handguns are destructive, and I despise them too, but right now I would rather not see our freedoms hindered any further, especially in a time when enough freedoms and rights are being ended.

And Dylan, I agree. The consequences of alcohol and drugs are sometimes just as or more harmful than handguns.

I still can't buy a bag of marijuana but I CAN go buy a weapon of personal destruction. Makes perfect sense to me!

Freedom to put a hole through a human? That is not a personal freedom to hold in high regard.

I understand the correlation between alcohol being capable of causing devastation but it certainly isn't designed for that purpose, whereas guns certainly are designed to kill.... and handguns designed to be easy to conceal.

Wouldn't a fair compromise be to allow larger weapons for personal saftey being that they are not easy to conceal?
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.

Last edited by hevusa; 05-09-2006 at 08:25 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:48 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites