Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Political Issues > Gun Control

Gun Control Debate and defend whether or not you believe that the second amendment protects individual rights to bear arms.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-11-2006, 11:19 AM   #81 (permalink)
Community Leader
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 737
Points: 4,924, Level: 44
Points: 4,924, Level: 44 Points: 4,924, Level: 44 Points: 4,924, Level: 44
Level up: 87%, 26 Points needed
Level up: 87% Level up: 87% Level up: 87%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
indago is offline
Reply With Quote
 
hevusa wrote:
Quote:
Sorry, I should have said "legally".
So, what does that mean?
Sponsored Links
Old 05-11-2006, 11:37 AM   #82 (permalink)
Community Leader
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 737
Points: 4,924, Level: 44
Points: 4,924, Level: 44 Points: 4,924, Level: 44 Points: 4,924, Level: 44
Level up: 87%, 26 Points needed
Level up: 87% Level up: 87% Level up: 87%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
indago is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Lidwen Wraith wrote:
Quote:
someone in a rage can kill with a poker, a baseball bat, an ax and so on, with just a little bit more exertion. Indeed, they often do. Or they can pour gasoline and set the person's bed on fire; some do that also. Granted guns make it possible to commit murder from a slightly more distant location and make it safer - but how important do you think that difference is to someone in the heat of a blind unreasoning rage?
I am recalling a few years back I saw a program on cable about a woman who was having a problem with an abusive husband. It was one of those real life incident programs. She had two small children. Each time she left her husband, he would come pleading for her return, and she would go back to him. Finally, after being again beaten, she left him and went to the court and got a restraining order. When he again appeared, her sister called the police. They came and arrested him. He vowed to kill her. She appeared on a news program with her face swollen, eyes blackened, it was a pitiful sight. She said: "He said he is going to kill me. I don't want to die, I've got kids to raise." It was really sad to see.

He got let out of jail on a weekend release, and nobody told her. He got a shotgun and went looking for. When he found her, she was in a kitchen. He raised the shotgun to fire and she ducked and ran outside. He fired at her twice, and missed. He caught her out on the front lawn and beat her to death with the shotgun. The shotgun was broken into pieces by his efforts. A neighbor from across the street ran over to her to try to intervene, but she was so badly beaten that she died.
Old 05-11-2006, 01:49 PM   #83 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,012
Country:
Points: 29,865, Level: 99
Points: 29,865, Level: 99 Points: 29,865, Level: 99 Points: 29,865, Level: 99
Level up: 92%, 135 Points needed
Level up: 92% Level up: 92% Level up: 92%
Activity: 12%
Activity: 12% Activity: 12% Activity: 12%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by indago
hevusa wrote:

So, what does that mean?

You said: That's because you don't really want to "buy a bag of marijuana".


I surely do!
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 05-11-2006, 04:44 PM   #84 (permalink)
Community Leader
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 737
Points: 4,924, Level: 44
Points: 4,924, Level: 44 Points: 4,924, Level: 44 Points: 4,924, Level: 44
Level up: 87%, 26 Points needed
Level up: 87% Level up: 87% Level up: 87%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
indago is offline
Reply With Quote
 
hevusa wrote:
Quote:
You said: That's because you don't really want to "buy a bag of marijuana".


I surely do!
Oh, man, that really cracked me up...

So, where do we go from here?

You know, if you really wanted "a bag of marijuana", you could get one.
Old 05-11-2006, 05:53 PM   #85 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,012
Country:
Points: 29,865, Level: 99
Points: 29,865, Level: 99 Points: 29,865, Level: 99 Points: 29,865, Level: 99
Level up: 92%, 135 Points needed
Level up: 92% Level up: 92% Level up: 92%
Activity: 12%
Activity: 12% Activity: 12% Activity: 12%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by indago
hevusa wrote:

Oh, man, that really cracked me up...

So, where do we go from here?

You know, if you really wanted "a bag of marijuana", you could get one.
Not legally.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 05-12-2006, 03:13 AM   #86 (permalink)
Block Captain
 
Lidwen Wraith's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Gender: Female
Posts: 371
Points: 2,826, Level: 32
Points: 2,826, Level: 32 Points: 2,826, Level: 32 Points: 2,826, Level: 32
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Lidwen Wraith is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hkbajwa
Sweet!! i look forward to your replies every day wraith anyhoo here goes:

You got a 9mm. The government got tanks. You are still at the physical mercy of a possibly corrupt government.
Hello Trouble !

In one sense yes, in another sense no. Those tanks do not drive themselves.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkjabwa
Oppression by the british monarch i.e an external entity ruling over you. That state of affairs most certianly justified this right to bear arms. It was a need of the time. Now there is no external force that threatens you. At least not one you can defend yourself against with a gun.
So now the only reason you have a gun is because you need to protest yourself from other equal american citizens that might threaten you. Suppose your government spent less on nukes and the likes and spent more on public infrastructure, education, healthcare and the likes. Don't you think that would reduce the threat from your fellow citizens?
Yes, I think if we had a total welfare state, the threat of harm from fellow citizens would be significantly reduced. However, your theory does not take into account sociopathy, competition for sexual partners, or psychotic behavior...all of which exist and are exacerbated by some of the conditions of modern life.

And I still disagree that an armed populace has no power against a corrupt government just because the government has tanks. Again, people drive those tanks and do not spend 24/7 inside them.
Your post actually gives me the heebees; you write as though we are now hobbled slaves of the government just because of technology.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkbajwa
It is not the government's job to make sure everybody does well financially. It IS however the government's job to make sure that equal opportunities exists for all ( which they do not) to make sure that nobody goes to bed hungry in the world's most powerful economy ( which they do), to make sure that everybody has a roof over their head ( which they don't), to make sure that ghetto life isn't at par with a 3rd world country ( which it is).. you know all those details that governments ARE responsible for.
Are you confusing the USA with Sweden, perhaps?
Many people concur that the government should do some or all of those things but it is certainly not part of our nation's heritage. Nowhere in any of the documents of this country does it stipulate the things that you wrote.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkjabwa
True i have not read it. And i do not deny that it probably still has a huge amount of relevant applications. However, you must also understand that our technological advancement changes the nature of world relations. Economic warfare is the name of the game today. People think and feel differently. The average mind has changed due to our ready access to information. That brings with it a set of conditions machiavelli could not possibly have considered.
The weapons have changed but the program remains the same. And the program is what I'm talking about here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkjabwa
Actually as we can see, there was nobody there to help those people. If they had been rescued in time, they might not have felt that they could take the law into their own hands.
Time out. "Take the law into their own hands"
??
That was NOT the issue. Taking the law into their own hands would be looting stores to get the food and supplies they needed. And they did that, and certainly I understand their doing that.
But
That was not what I was talking about. I was talking about some of them running around raping the young girls, of which there was a significant incidence.
I brought that up to counter your point that people's behavior cannot be controlled with violence and guns - WRONG. If cops had been there, with guns, those young girls would have been protected.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkjabwa
The point is that given the choice, sending in rescue missions took priority over law enforecement. How can you enforece law on a desperate population? I just say that the same list of priorities governing the rescue mission (rescue first, police later) should be applied to overall style of governance
On the contrary they must be applied simultaneously.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkjabwa
Forget the kingdom of god.
Mind if I don't?

Quote:
Originally Posted by hkjabwa
I'm talking about the kingdom of logic. Look nobody believes they are evil. Evil is a description that is always applied from without. If we could just stop defining others as evil, we would go a long way towards feeling at ease.
I have not ONCE in this conversation even mentioned the word "evil".
There is not room here to go into an exhaustive dissertation on what causes people to commit hideously cruel acts upon other people and animals.
But they do.
And the perpetrators are by no means always "poor".
I continue to hope for the best as regards this world and every creature within it, hkjabwa. But I do not kid myself that everyone wants to be good. MOST people want to be good. That is as good as it gets at the present time.
And everything that applies to 'people' applies to governments too.

Thanks again for a good discussion; I'll look forward to your complete capitulation by and by

Be back in awhile.

Last edited by Lidwen Wraith; 05-12-2006 at 03:17 AM.
Old 05-12-2006, 09:59 AM   #87 (permalink)
Community Leader
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 737
Points: 4,924, Level: 44
Points: 4,924, Level: 44 Points: 4,924, Level: 44 Points: 4,924, Level: 44
Level up: 87%, 26 Points needed
Level up: 87% Level up: 87% Level up: 87%
Activity: 5%
Activity: 5% Activity: 5% Activity: 5%
indago is offline
Reply With Quote
 
hevusa wrote:
Quote:
Not legally.
Is that what is stopping you from obtaining "a bag of marijuana"?
Old 05-12-2006, 01:19 PM   #88 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,012
Country:
Points: 29,865, Level: 99
Points: 29,865, Level: 99 Points: 29,865, Level: 99 Points: 29,865, Level: 99
Level up: 92%, 135 Points needed
Level up: 92% Level up: 92% Level up: 92%
Activity: 12%
Activity: 12% Activity: 12% Activity: 12%
hevusa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by indago
hevusa wrote:

Is that what is stopping you from obtaining "a bag of marijuana"?


That is what is stopping me from buying a bag of marijuana that is priced fairly.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 05-12-2006, 01:55 PM   #89 (permalink)
Council Member
 
hkbajwa's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pakistan
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,179
Points: 5,047, Level: 45
Points: 5,047, Level: 45 Points: 5,047, Level: 45 Points: 5,047, Level: 45
Level up: 49%, 103 Points needed
Level up: 49% Level up: 49% Level up: 49%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hkbajwa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lidwen Wraith
Thanks again for a good discussion; I'll look forward to your complete capitulation by and by

Be back in awhile.
Cheeky lady... i'll get you yet !!!!
Love for all, Hatred for none
Old 05-16-2006, 12:17 AM   #90 (permalink)
Citizen
 
chachynga's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Texas Republic
Gender: Male
Posts: 112
Points: 1,845, Level: 25
Points: 1,845, Level: 25 Points: 1,845, Level: 25 Points: 1,845, Level: 25
Level up: 45%, 55 Points needed
Level up: 45% Level up: 45% Level up: 45%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
chachynga is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by playfullheart
The best reason to have a gun is to protect yourself.
From all sorts of crooks and kooks including the Government...

We have to have Guns to keep our liberty, and that is already down the toilet in the commie state we now live within...

we have guns to protect us from Big Brother

And they do deter crime...

Every household should have one, it's the biblical Law of Jesus.

Don't love Jesus, then don't own a weapon.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites