I consider propaganda when you invent facts. Bush and monkey's?? Must have missed that, but another keen observation by Moore if you ask me.

He has been right, all along, about everything. It is only now that most of America has caught up (approval ratings at what, 32% now?)

First of all, what does Michael Moore have to do with the credibility of the Flight 93 film? As if he's an automatic supporter of Moore just because he's a liberal. Its quite amusing to see generalities being thrown. "Oh, the people that rated it D's of F's are liberals! Those damn tree-huging terrorist traitors!" Please, it really makes yourself look like a dumbass.

Perhaps they were rating it that way because it was a bad movie? Or how about the thought that they're exploiting a tragedy to make money? Wasn't a whole premises of the anti-Moore movement because he was making money off of what he did?

No one knows for sure what exactly happened on that plane (although we should by now, but of coarse they're not releasing the black boxes), and I don't think we shall ever know for sure. But one thing is for sure, Al-Qaeda or not, I don't want to see the largest attack that happened on our soil be turned into a marketing ploy where reality is turned into an all-inspiring hero story. Most of what is on that movie is speculation. It's based off of true events, its not a show on the history channel.

Anything that strays from realism and warps it into this typical hollywood love or hero story in the interests of making profit isn't exactly a documentary. And the fact that such things aren't taken as mostly fiction in which they are, means its propaganda. Anything that warps people's emotions, by showing grotesque images to relate something bad with something or someone, or anything that over-glorifies something for the benifit of others is called propaganda. This film is propaganda.

Read the reviews, partner. They speak for themself. We have movies about wars, and real life violence situations all the time, why is this the only movie being critcized, and why does it have to be exploitation? This is a story that directly affects all Americans. So for generalizing about me, you can go fuck your self.

I just don't think people are buying it.

Release the audio tapes I say.

And while we are at it release the pentagon videos as well.

Why did the plane hit land instead of a targeted building?? Seems like the story might be true..

If the story is true how about a photo of the plane crash site (debris would be nice as well, not just a hole in the ground)? Bodies?

Or are we supposed to believe that this plane evaporated on contact like the pentagon wreck?

Where is the debris from the jetliners that hit the WTC towers? Doesn't seem to me that they found much, if any, of that.

Must have been a hoax.

It would have been nice if investigators had a chance to review the wreckage at the WTC before it was hauled off.

Magic planes that just disappear! It is like we are kids again... just use your imagination!

Magic planes??

mmmm I've heard of magic buses, not planes