I don't know why you think I wouldn't think that? Most liberals have a double standard. Clearly, those who run the school do not seem to think they are fostering a double standard. They sure aint conservatives who made this rule.

You don't know squat about "most liberals".

Here's a query.

Do I support the school in this? Yes or no...


< snort >
Do you REALLY want to go into the hypocrisy and double standards of conservatives???

I've already shown the double standards of Republicans in quotes on gas prices.

Here is another subject where Republicans have proven incredibly hypocritical...

http://people.tribe.net/matt_mahi/bl...e-fe4253870037

There's a tiny error in what you and the article states. The walkout was not about encouragement to break the law. The walkout was in favor of CHANGING the law, or at least prevent changes that would be discriminatory. That is not the same as being "allowed to break the rules to demonstrate in favor of breaking the law " like you said.

I say this because the article is clearly one that seeks to scandalize a separate issue. This is the issue that if you do NOT support strict punishment of illegal aliens you are a lousy american. That's just a subjective statement which the mexican kids have a full right to disagree with.

That said, denying Denhalter his right was certainly a massively counterproductive move. Definately hypocritical and uncalled for. No school system should take sides like that.

Wrong. It is not discriminatory to demand that people obey the law. The kids do not have the right to leave school. I agree with your last sentence.

Speaking of "squat". Do you squat when you pee? See, I can be rude also without a reason.

How do you know who I know or don't know. You sure claim to know a lot about me. Do you always act so rudely with people you disagree with? I must really make your blood boil, it comes out in every message you make to me.

You misunderstood me.

I meant that the mexican kids did not walk out to encourage lawlessness ( which is what the article makes it sound like) They walked out to show their disagreement with proposed changes to the law.

Can you see the difference?

Still the action by the school was discriminatory no doubt. I just take issue with this sort of writing because it is loaded with subjective condemnation, instead of factual analysis. just my personal opinion.

They walked out during school hours. That is against the rules. There is plenty of time to protest when school is over or before. This makes it okay to skip school. I don't agree with that.

Alright dude i know how important these small issues are to you compared to possible discriminatory policies.

BAAAAAD kids.. walking out of school like that .. THE AUDACITY, THE NERVE

Lets just forget about the fact that most of them probably had many family members who would be severely affected by the immigration policy...

yeah it's definately MORE important to talk about their heretical walkout from school.

Yes it is important. No one is being discriminated against. The immigration policy is that people enter this country legally. I see you have a problem with peope obeying the law. So according to you, if you don't like the law, you can just skip school, join a protest to uphold breaking the laws of immigration and then go back to school like nothing happend. Right dude.

yeah yeah alias.. ur right

Except it was skipping school to join a protest to CHANGE the law ( i think the US constitution allows that no?) and then go back to school.

the only criminal activity here is of truancy. The protest is to CHANGE The law so that those peopl eare not criminals any more. it's been seen before no? My critique of the issue was not a defence of the wrong actions by the school. It was jsut an observation how somehow you managed to make these kids seem like DOUBLE criminals, when they actually only skipped school.