Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Other Topics of Discussion > Media and Films

Media and Films Debate anything you have seen on the news, in the media, or in any film you have watched.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-05-2006, 11:48 AM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
School Sued For Silencing Student
Southern California School Sued for Silencing Student on Illegal Immigration

The law firm of Lively, Ackerman & Cowles has sued California's Jurupa Unified School District for silencing a student who attempted to speak out on the issue of illegal immigration in a peaceful way.

Riverside, CA (PRWEB) June 5, 2006 -- The public interest firm of Lively, Ackerman & Cowles (www.LivelyAckerman.com) filed suit on behalf of Jurupa Valley High School student Joshua Denhalter late last week. The First Amendment suit alleges that the public high school has intentionally interfered with his right to speak out on the issue of illegal immigration. Case Number RIC450811 was filed in Riverside County Superior Court.

Mr. Denhalter alleges that on March 27, 2006, dozens of high school students, mostly of Mexican-American descent, illegally walked out of school in protest of legislation that was being proposed by the U.S. Congress (HR4437) concerning illegal immigration. He was not one of these students and chose to act lawfully.

Instead of illegally walking out of school and being truant, Denhalter chose to organize a legitimate and lawful counter-protest/assembly during the lunch hour on or about March 30, 2006. The peaceable assembly was to take place across from the school on a public sidewalk (i.e., a traditional public forum).

The peaceable assembly would not have disrupted school activities because Jurupa Valley High School has an “open lunch” period. This means that students are free to come and go during this time. As such, any student could have “walked out” during the lunch to attend the assembly and there would be no disruption or violation of truancy laws.

On the morning of March 30, 2006, Denhalter began handing out flyers for his event. That same morning, around 7:30 AM, he was approached by school officials and told that he could not hand out flyers advertising his First Amendment protected activities. He refused to give up his right to pass out handbills/flyers. As a result of his refusal to give up his constitutional rights, Denhalter was suspended for “handing out flyers (before school) advocating the disruption of school activities”. However, the school did not punish the dozens of students who walked out in violation of the law several days before.

Furthermore, between March 27 and March 30, 2006, the school allowed MECHA to sponsor an on-campus rally in opposition to HR4437. Denhalter asked for permission to sponsor a similar counter-rally on campus but was flatly denied by the school district's board.

Finally, just the week before filing of this complaint, on May 25, 2006, the school prohibited Denhalter from wearing a “Save Our State” t-shirt by telling him that he needed to turn the shirt inside out and not ever wear it again. The content of the political speech set forth on the shirt was the sole basis for this censorship and prior restraint of Denhalter’s rights. He seeks a restraining order allowing him to express himself freely as to political matters until the end of the school year (i.e., June 21, 2006).

According to lead attorney Richard D. Ackerman, “This is one of the worst governmental censorship cases I have seen in over a decade of practice. It is simply unbelievable that a school district would take sides with those who promote illegal activity over a student wishing to express his protected views in a traditionally and legally acceptable manner. These officials must be severely punished for their actions.” The law firm is handling this matter on a pro bono basis. The firm says that temporary restraining orders will be sought against the school within the next ten days.

Donations are being taken for Denhalter's legal costs through the donation link at www.profamilylawcenter.com. Those interested in helping this young man can designate the money to be used for the "Josh Denhalter First Amendment Fund." Tax deductible donations will only be used to assist in his and related First Amendment cases. Mr. Denhalter is going to boot camp five days after graduating from Jurupa Valley High School and cannot afford the costs of this litigation.

http://tinyurl.com/pyfgl

I would just love to hear comments from my liberal American friends.

Last edited by alias; 06-05-2006 at 11:53 AM.
Sponsored Links
Old 06-05-2006, 12:15 PM   #2 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,873
Country:
Points: 28,460, Level: 99
Points: 28,460, Level: 99 Points: 28,460, Level: 99 Points: 28,460, Level: 99
Level up: 7%, 1,540 Points needed
Level up: 7% Level up: 7% Level up: 7%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
I would just love to hear comments from my liberal American friends.

They shouldn't censor him unless he was being openly racist (which sometimes goes hand in hand with this issue).
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 06-05-2006, 12:19 PM   #3 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
They shouldn't censor him unless he was being openly racist (which sometimes goes hand in hand with this issue).
You're right, they shouldn't censor him. Do you think it is racist to demand that people to obey the law if they have a different skin color than you?
Old 06-05-2006, 12:20 PM   #4 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,873
Country:
Points: 28,460, Level: 99
Points: 28,460, Level: 99 Points: 28,460, Level: 99 Points: 28,460, Level: 99
Level up: 7%, 1,540 Points needed
Level up: 7% Level up: 7% Level up: 7%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
You're right, they shouldn't censor him. Do you think it is racist to demand that people to obey the law if they have a different skin color than you?

No. Do you think it is right to exploit people for cheap labor?
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 06-05-2006, 12:39 PM   #5 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
No. Do you think it is right to exploit people for cheap labor?
No, I don't think it is right. What does that have to do with demanding people obey the immigration law? If companies in the USA are hiring illegal aliens, they should be fined in my opinion.
Old 06-05-2006, 12:46 PM   #6 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,873
Country:
Points: 28,460, Level: 99
Points: 28,460, Level: 99 Points: 28,460, Level: 99 Points: 28,460, Level: 99
Level up: 7%, 1,540 Points needed
Level up: 7% Level up: 7% Level up: 7%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
What does that have to do with demanding people obey the immigration law?
People often combine their racism with this issue to mask it. If the student was only presenting facts there is no problem... but this is usually not the case. At that point the school has an obligation to keep the students safe from what could cause a violent situation.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 06-05-2006, 01:13 PM   #7 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
People often combine their racism with this issue to mask it. If the student was only presenting facts there is no problem... but this is usually not the case. At that point the school has an obligation to keep the students safe from what could cause a violent situation.
The point of the article is that students were allowed to break the rules to demonstrate in favor of breaking the law and this young man was not allowed to demonstrate in favor of obeying the law. That is what the article is saying, no more, no less. The point of the article is the left is allowed to demonstrate and break the rules in school and this young man because he has a differening view is not allowed. That is what the article is about. This is about censorship.
Old 06-05-2006, 02:41 PM   #8 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
aMFliberal's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Needham, MA
Posts: 2,335
Points: 8,487, Level: 62
Points: 8,487, Level: 62 Points: 8,487, Level: 62 Points: 8,487, Level: 62
Level up: 13%, 263 Points needed
Level up: 13% Level up: 13% Level up: 13%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
aMFliberal is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Sounds like this is a pretty slam dunk case. The school officials were in the wrong completely, a blatant breach of the First Amendment. Geez, what's even offensive about the t-shirt "Save our State"? Good lord...

I don't see how any judge will rule against him, considering the school has an open lunch period and the demonstration was to take place on the sidewalk across the street. Absolutley ridiculous...what were those school officials thinking?

I don't know why you think liberals would support this kind of behavior.
But it don't take much to get me by
So just booze me up and get me high
Ween
Old 06-05-2006, 02:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,873
Country:
Points: 28,460, Level: 99
Points: 28,460, Level: 99 Points: 28,460, Level: 99 Points: 28,460, Level: 99
Level up: 7%, 1,540 Points needed
Level up: 7% Level up: 7% Level up: 7%
Activity: 100%
Activity: 100% Activity: 100% Activity: 100%
hevusa is online now
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
The point of the article is that students were allowed to break the rules to demonstrate in favor of breaking the law and this young man was not allowed to demonstrate in favor of obeying the law. That is what the article is saying, no more, no less. The point of the article is the left is allowed to demonstrate and break the rules in school and this young man because he has a differening view is not allowed. That is what the article is about. This is about censorship.

The student should be allowed to speak his mind.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

There is little doubt that the world in general is more liberal than it was 50 years ago and beyond. Conservatives are simply roadblocks on the path to an ever more progressive and liberal world. What a sad existence.
Old 06-05-2006, 09:58 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
The student should be allowed to speak his mind.
...even if he doesn't have much to say - if you know what I mean.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:42 PM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites