Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Other Topics of Discussion > Media and Films

Media and Films Debate anything you have seen on the news, in the media, or in any film you have watched.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-18-2006, 06:16 PM   #101 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
Ahh yes. Resorting to sarcastic pretense of how others in your supposed "we" have come to a conclusion...
Usually a sign that you're trying to pretend you've won without being able to address the ACTUAL issue at hand.



I am not assuming one way or the other.
YOU are.

And as I have asked you, SO WHAT. Suppose there aren't any gay CEOs.
What does that supposedly prove?
It proves that I was right and you were wrong.
Sponsored Links
Old 12-19-2006, 05:02 PM   #102 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias View Post
It proves that I was right and you were wrong.
ROFLMAO!
"right" and "wrong" about WHAT???
I never made any claims about gay CEOs.
YOU were the one trying to use "gay CEOs" to make a point that I REALLY don't think you remember any more.

"right" and "wrong" about WHAT???
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 12-19-2006, 06:16 PM   #103 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
ROFLMAO!
"right" and "wrong" about WHAT???
I never made any claims about gay CEOs.
YOU were the one trying to use "gay CEOs" to make a point that I REALLY don't think you remember any more.

"right" and "wrong" about WHAT???
Anyone can read the thread and see. I said there were no CEO's who were publicly homo. You said that just because we don't know doesn't mean there are any. Then you went off on the race thing like you usually do and said there were no black CEO's that we know of, at which point I proved there were. Then I asked you to show us how many publicly known homos are CEO's of corporations and you couldn't produce any. Now after having gone in your circle, you are so dizzy you don't even know what to say.

There are no known homo CEO's in America. If there are, please tell us who they are. If not, then you can't tell us anything else except that there are none known, and that proves my initial point. There are no known homo CEO's. The only one who is being laughed at is you for your pathetic attempt to confuse the facts so as to not admit your failings.
Old 12-20-2006, 07:34 AM   #104 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias View Post
Anyone can read the thread and see.
What they see, and what you think they see, is often two different things.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
I said there were no CEO's who were publicly homo.
You're avoiding the question.
SO WHAT???

Suppose what you say were true. What does it mean?
Does it mean anything?
Is it even important?

Most CEOs are male. Does that mean anything negative regarding women?


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
You said that just because we don't know doesn't mean there are any. Then you went off on the race thing like you usually do and said there were no black CEO's that we know of, at which point I proved there were.
I never claimed there were NO black CEOs.
I simply stated that we DID NOT KNOW of any black CEOs.

Then you searched for black CEO information, and found it.

Quite frankly, I don't see a point in figuring out whether or not there are any gay CEOs. I don't know.
I doubt you have put forth any effort to figure it out for yourself.

Not knowing about something is not the same as proving that it doesn't exist.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Then I asked you to show us how many publicly known homos are CEO's of corporations and you couldn't produce any. Now after having gone in your circle, you are so dizzy you don't even know what to say.
It's not that I "couldn't" produce any.
It's more like I didn't see a point so I didn't even try.
If I asked you to prove that there were Lutheran CEOs, and you didn't, would that actually MEAN anything?

In this whole exchange, you keep missing one fundamental point.
IT IS MEANINGLESS.

I have asked you repeatedly now WHAT IS THE POINT of figuring out whether or not gay CEOs exist.
Instead of answering that question, you keep insisting that it should be done.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
There are no known homo CEO's in America.
Wrong.
We do not know.

I could say there are no known Buddhist CEOs, no known Lutheran CEOs, no known CEOs from Alabama, no known this CEOs, no known that CEOs.
It's all meaningless.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
If not, then you can't tell us anything else except that there are none known, and that proves my initial point. There are no known homo CEO's.
Dear GAWD alias. Is THAT all you're bawling about?
I have already admitted that neither of us know any gay CEOs.
So, if you actually could THINK for a minute, you'ld realize that I am admitting that we do not know any gay CEOs.

The leap to "NO known gay CEOs" is logically false.
Any POINT to observing "no known gay CEOs" still hasn't been shown.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
The only one who is being laughed at is you for your pathetic attempt to confuse the facts so as to not admit your failings.
"failings"?
ROFLMAo!
I'm still waiting on you to prove a point.

Suppose there are no known gay CEOs.
Then what???
What does that mean?

You're going on and on about something that has no point.
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 12-20-2006, 12:59 PM   #105 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Then tell us who the homo CEO's are.
Old 12-20-2006, 05:31 PM   #106 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Suppose there are no known gay CEOs.
Then what???
What does that mean?

You're going on and on about something that has no point.
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 12-20-2006, 07:22 PM   #107 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
Suppose there are no known gay CEOs.
Then what???
What does that mean?

You're going on and on about something that has no point.
The point is exactly what I said it was. The point I made was that it is politically correct to be vocal and public about your homosexuality if you are a professor in a college or in a government job, but people are not vocal about it in private business. The reason? Becuase it's bad for business. The educator and government worker are assured of their job no matter what. It's obvious. You can't produce any homos in private business who are CEO's, but we can find a lot who are in education and government. Why is that foundit? All you can say it doesn't matter. Obviously, there is a reason. You just do not wish to accept it. Admitting you are a homo CEO would be bad for business. If it wasn't, they would be proclaiming it as loud as those in government and education.

Last edited by alias; 12-20-2006 at 07:26 PM.
Old 12-20-2006, 08:01 PM   #108 (permalink)
Account Deleted
Join Date: Dec 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,738
Country:
Points: 16,625, Level: 82
Points: 16,625, Level: 82 Points: 16,625, Level: 82 Points: 16,625, Level: 82
Level up: 55%, 225 Points needed
Level up: 55% Level up: 55% Level up: 55%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
OhDear is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Please overlook my sense of humor and all, but I just had to post this to this particular thread!

This Thread That Never Ends!

OD
Old 12-20-2006, 09:04 PM   #109 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias View Post
The point is exactly what I said it was. The point I made was that it is politically correct to be vocal and public about your homosexuality if you are a professor in a college or in a government job, but people are not vocal about it in private business. The reason? Becuase it's bad for business.
Alias?
Listen very closely.

That is true for a WIDE SPECTRUM of issues in the business world.
Do you see any "openly Christian" CEOs running around, vocal about Christian rights and hanging Christian symbols throughout their stores?

How about political issues? Do you see business "vocal" expressing a specific and exclusive view-point on a political issue unrelated to their business???

What you describe has NOTHING to do with "gay" and everything to do with a GENERAL issue of people doing business in the work-place, and taking care of other things elsewhere.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
The educator and government worker are assured of their job no matter what. It's obvious. You can't produce any homos in private business who are CEO's, but we can find a lot who are in education and government. Why is that foundit?
Actually, you can product a lot of people who SUPPORT GAY EQUALITY...
Whether or not they are "gay" is an entirely different matter.

And considering a few posts ago you were under the impression that it was illegal to fire somebody for just being gay, it's funny to see the way you are now trying to spin things.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
All you can say it doesn't matter. Obviously, there is a reason.
The reason is simple.
EDUCATION belongs in the SCHOOLS. Whether it be education on homosexuality or heterosexuality or a wide variety of issues, THAT is where education takes place.
You label it "gay" because people don't teach your ignorance. Instead they teach RESEARCHED and DOCUMENTED FACTS.
Not the inaccuracies you try to label as "opinions".

As for government, what the heck do you think you are talking about???
Politics?????
Of course people talk politics in the LEGISLATOR.
But as for the post office, are you really trying to imply that those work-places are so much different???


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
Admitting you are a homo CEO would be bad for business. If it wasn't, they would be proclaiming it as loud as those in government and education.
Admitting to being a gay CEO is like admitting to being a Christian CEO or a CEO who supports X political action.
It is IRRELEVANT to the business, so most people keep it OUT of the business.

You claim "bad for business", but that's just plain inane and not looking at the facts.
Like I pointed out, most businesses ON THEIR OWN adopt policies which forbid discrimination against gays. Is THAT bad for business???
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 12-20-2006, 10:21 PM   #110 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Keep going, you're doing just fine. Any luck on finding any homo CEO's?

Best Christian Places to Work: Co-CEO Synergy - Christianity Today magazine - ChristianityTodayLibrary.com

CEO Institute

Business: CEOs of faith

Last edited by alias; 12-20-2006 at 10:25 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites