What product does the company produce that has the homo CEO? What is their business they do to earn a profit?

You keep asking these ridiculously irrelevant questions and they do not prove anything.

I have proven most people WANT companies to NOT discriminate against gays.
You have shown NO REAL Reason why companies would go against their own policy.

You have shown NO EXAMPLE where an openly gay prospective CEO was turned down because he was gay.

Most people DO NOT BRING their private lives or beliefs into the work-place.
You have addressed NONE of this.

You didn't answer my question. The answer is "nothing". He is a CEO of a company that produces nothing. It's a human rights organization. In other words, another "progressive" politician, which again proves my point. Thanks.

You asked for a CEO.
I gave you one.
And now you're squiriming like crazy to make it not count.
So predictable.


And ignores everyone of mine.

You keep asking these ridiculously irrelevant questions and they do not prove anything.

I have proven most people WANT companies to NOT discriminate against gays.
You have shown NO REAL Reason why companies would go against their own policy.

You have shown NO EXAMPLE where an openly gay prospective CEO was turned down because he was gay.

Most people DO NOT BRING their private lives or beliefs into the work-place.
You have addressed NONE of this.

It has been addressed over and over. If no one brings their personal lives into it, then why is it publicized in government and in the colleges when someone is a homo? The press made a point of stating the Fire Chief and the president of the college were homos. The fact you cannot produce a homo CEO who works for a corporation and only produced one who works for a nonprofit agency proves my point again. You still have not produced a homo CEO for a corporation that has a product to sell? Why? Because for a company who is business and has to sell their product is not going to hurt sales by putting a homo in charge. That would be bad business. I can't help it that you will not accept that. It's the truth until you prove it isn't and you're not doing very well after a few days trying.

It's hilarious how you insist I show you a gay CEO, and you reply with counters of people who are publicly gay, BUT NOT CEOS...

They aren't even businesses.

You address it by doing PRECISELY what you complain I shouldn't.

Now you're confused again. My point was to show how homos are more than willing to say they are homos in government or education, but not in the business world. I did that. If you wish to keep going in circles, you can do it by yourself. I'm ready for a new topic. I've pretty much pounded you into the ground with this one.

This is inane.
Gays don't "say they are homos" in the business world because it's not relevant to business.
You CLAIMED that they do it in "government", but you haven't explained what the heck you think you mean by that. Politicians? They bring EVERYTHING onto the table to get a vote. Painting themselves as an image that they want people to vote for. Some gays are out. Some gays ARE NOT.
Education? Did you ever fricken go to school? Kids ask all sorts of irrelevant questions about their teachers. In some ways, it's an artificial social environment. A "single" teacher is going to get all sorts of questions about who they are dating and stupid crap like that.


"pounded me into the ground"?
Each time I ask you what you think you are trying to prove you keep coming back with some COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT STATEMENT.
Take your last one here. It leaves me saying, YET AGAIN, "so what?"

Even if we take your statement as true, SO WHAT if gays are more open in government and education than they are in business???
Does that actually PROVE anything?

As is often the case, when you try to water down your statements, you leave yourself without a case...

I did explain what I meant by that. Homos are public about their sexuality when they are in government or education jobs. It's the current fad of "progressiveness".

I did explain it and I just explained it again.

Why did the media make is a point to tell us the sexual preference of these 2 lezbos? Because the lezbos made it a point to have it made public.

And again, even if we accept your statement as true, SO WHAT?

The same could be said of a lot of Christians. Politicians typically include statements about their religious beliefs. And it seems fairly obvious that a lot of Christians want to infiltrate schools and promulgate Christian prayer.

Yet how many offices do you see where the boss gets everybody together for a morning prayer?

Does that prove something negative about Christians?


They made it a point because it WAS RELEVANT TO THE MOTIVE FOR SUICIDE.