| ||||||
| Militaries and War Debate and discuss global militaries, past and present wars including the war on terror. |
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Moderator Join Date: Jun 2005 Posts: 1,612
| Army Orders Soldiers to Shed Dragon Skin or Lose SGLI Death -Army Orders Soldiers to Shed Dragon Skin or Lose SGLI Death Benefits www.sftt.org/main.cfm?act...tmlId=4514 "Two deploying soldiers and a concerned mother reported Friday afternoon that the U.S. Army appears to be singling out soldiers who have purchased Pinnacle's Dragon Skin Body Armor for special treatment. The soldiers, who are currently staging for combat operations from a secret location, reported that their commander told them if they were wearing Pinnacle Dragon Skin and were killed their beneficiaries might not receive the death benefits from their $400,000 SGLI life insurance policies. The soldiers were ordered to leave their privately purchased body armor at home or face the possibility of both losing their life insurance benefit and facing disciplinary action." This is complete BS, I just don't know what to say to this shit. We send our troops out to die but we will not give them the equipment they need to survive, just complete and utter bullshit. Godbless, Tadpole. “I am a Republican. I\'m loyal to the party of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. And I believe that my party, in some ways, has strayed from those principles, particularly on the issue of fiscal discipline.” -John McCain "Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You did not place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible." -Jamie Raskin | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsored Links |
| | #2 (permalink) | |
| Website Owner Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Taxachusetts Gender: ![]() Posts: 5,502 Country: ![]() Thanks: 12
Thanked 70 Times in 62 Posts
| I can't say that I agree with the Arm's decision to do something like this... Why? Could it be because the Army thinks that their stuff is better for the soldiers?? | |
| | #3 (permalink) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Head of Security Join Date: May 2005 Location: The Cradle of Liberty Gender: ![]() Posts: 10,352 Country: ![]()
| Know, it is because if no one uses the issued armor, the contract will be ditched and the Army has already spent tons of money investing in Interceptor Body Armor. Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand. http://www.armysailor.com http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog ------------------------------------ Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere Quixotic Journey | |||||||||||||||||||||
| | #4 (permalink) | ||
| Website Owner Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Taxachusetts Gender: ![]() Posts: 5,502 Country: ![]() Thanks: 12
Thanked 70 Times in 62 Posts
| Quote:
| ||
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.
















Linear Mode