Defending the Truth

Yeah, and I'm a world-class driver and world champion bass fisherman. Just ask me.

I just love how you constantly assume. I have no reason to lie. And it is sad that when confronted with evidence which puts you to shame, such as this (clicky), you get personal and just complain that we're lying. Fine, don't believe me if you want, that's your prerogative, I really don't care.

So? Are we supposed to be impressed with that? Not me. Maybe you are just another young uneducated historian. To what do you ascribe the difference between young and old historians and the difference in view points?

We've been through this crap with you before...

You don't read anything that doesn't agree with you, but you claim to know everything about other people's arguments...

I think after listening to someone for a while anyone pretty much knows who and what they are. I'm sure you don't listen to Rush all day every day but you don't like him do you.

No, I didn't point that out to impress you, I pointed it out because you guys seem to believe I know nothing about history when in actuality I am one of the few people here who use historical example. Just another young uneducated historian? And what, you're educated or something?

And if they are truely good historians, then there shouldn't be much of a difference of historical perspective; because no matter how old you are or how young you are, historical fact doesn't change. Historians look at the facts. Of coarse their political views differ, but many fall into the same catagory because they are not ignorant to the mistakes of the past. A very good reason why the vast majority of credited historians oppose the Bush administration is because it has been one of the most ignorant to historical example; and many of our past mistakes are repeating themselves.

I can tell you things Rush has ACTUALLY SAID that I find absurd and ridiculous.
Same with Ann Coulter. I've already done that for Coulter.

Can you tell me exactly what Franken has said to give you that conclusion?
Or is it like I suspect? You realized I busted you for concluding about Franken before you even heard him, and then made up a lie to weasel out of it...

As a matter of fact, I am educated or something. Do you think everyone who disagrees with you is uneducated? That is what is called arrogance on your part.

If Bush fought this war like other wars you and your friends would cry forever and whine forever. He is trying to fight a politically correct war and you still don't like it. Damned if you do and damned if you don't. The fact is you don't like Bush because he is not your flavor....democrat.

Why would I lie about hearing Franken when all I have to do is turn the radio on to Airhead America? That's nuts. The only thing you busted was some more brain cells trying to match wits with me.

What the hell! Do you constantly insist on assumptions and personal insults?

And just to let you know, I never called you uneducated. But if you were able to look through the fog of biggotry that clouds your sight, you would be able to see that. You would also be able to see that it was you who called me uneducated just because I don't agree with your points of view. Get your damned facts straight before you act like a little imature asshole.

Instead of approaching me with facts and resources that prove your assumptions, you just fly them our way and just assume they're right because they're coming from the mind of the all-knowing wise Alias. And to prove your two-demensional mind, you automatically assume that because I oppose this administration, oh, I must be Democratic. But the truth is is that I am not; there are a lot of things about the Democratic Party that I deeply oppose. So please for future occurances, please focus on the points I make, and don't make stupid assumptions and personal attacks. Its a debate forum not a flame forum.