Congressional *Support* for our Troops

alias · 08-18-2006, 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foundit66

I realize you want to hide behind Sarge, but Sarge didn't say what you did.
Sarge's claims don't address what you claimed.

My reply TO YOU is not affected by Sarge's statement.

If you want to drop your foolishness, I understand. But Sarge's statements are not a reason for doing so.

I don't hide behind anyone. You know that. I confront you more than anyone around here so for you to make such an asinine statement shows to me and to the rest of the civilized world just how idiotic and moronic such a statement is. Sarge is in the military and you are not at this moment so that is why I say Sarge knows what he is talking about. Common sense. If that tweaks your nozzle, then get over it.

foundit66 · 08-18-2006, 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

I don't hide behind anyone. You know that. I confront you more than anyone around here so for you to make such an asanince statement shows to me and to the rest of the civilized world just how idiotic and moronic such a statement is.

Alias, there is a HUGE difference inbetween you being CONFRONTATIONAL, and you "confronting" things on the issue.

You often use insults, irrelevant commentary, and lame innuendo to hide from the issue and avoid arguing the issue.

Just because you reply with bluster doesn't mean you are "confronting" anything on the issue.

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

Stick to the facts of the debate and cut the personal crap or we are gonna have another insult war around here and you know who's gonna win.

How can I "stick to the facts" when you have DROPPED EVERYTHING you were arguing about?
You aren't replying to anything I said, beyond just telling me that I should refer to Sarge's post which doesn't defend YOUR statements and doesn't address my comments on why YOUR statements were erroneous.

Sarge is talking about the helmet issue regarding supply.
YOU were talking about the GENERAL issue regarding POLITICS and trying to slur liberals, while ignoring the fact that more democrats in congress are working towards helping head injuries than republicans.
And you keep hiding from that fact.

alias · 08-18-2006, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foundit66

Alias, there is a HUGE difference inbetween you being CONFRONTATIONAL, and you "confronting" things on the issue.

You often use insults, irrelevant commentary, and lame innuendo to hide from the issue and avoid arguing the issue.

Just because you reply with bluster doesn't mean you are "confronting" anything on the issue.

How can I "stick to the facts" when you have DROPPED EVERYTHING you were arguing about?
You aren't replying to anything I said, beyond just telling me that I should refer to Sarge's post which doesn't defend YOUR statements and doesn't address my comments on why YOUR statements were erroneous.

Sarge is talking about the helmet issue regarding supply.
YOU were talking about the GENERAL issue regarding POLITICS and trying to slur liberals, while ignoring the fact that more democrats in congress are working towards helping head injuries than republicans.
And you keep hiding from that fact.

Show me an insult I made to you in this thread.

foundit66 · 08-18-2006, 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

Show me an insult I made to you in this thread.

Did I claim you made an insult "in this thread"?
I said: "You often use insults, irrelevant commentary, and lame innuendo to hide from the issue and avoid arguing the issue."

This would be part of "irrelevant commentary" and "lame innuendo" as you "hide from the issue and avoid arguing the issue".

Why can't you just admit it that the DEMOCRATS support the troops health (head injuries) MORE THAN the Republicans do?

chrisg967 · 08-18-2006, 05:02 PM

Isn't the whole point of this thread the fact that our fighting sons and daughters have been suffering brain injuries AND that the funding to the Brain Injury Center is being cut? So you argue that the helmets are being improved. Okay, but that does NOT help the ones who got injured wearing older gear. Let's stop arguing and help the ones who got injured. Forget the celebreties for now. Do a bake sale. Do a car wash. Sell magazine subscriptions. Solicit donations. Sell Christmas baskets by raffle, and get neighborhood businesses to help donate stuff. Hold a book sale. Advertise like mad. Then donate the proceeds to the closest DVBIC site.

alias · 08-18-2006, 05:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foundit66

Did I claim you made an insult "in this thread"?
I said: "You often use insults, irrelevant commentary, and lame innuendo to hide from the issue and avoid arguing the issue."

This would be part of "irrelevant commentary" and "lame innuendo" as you "hide from the issue and avoid arguing the issue".

Why can't you just admit it that the DEMOCRATS support the troops health (head injuries) MORE THAN the Republicans do?

If there are no insults from me in this thread then why did you bring it up in this thread? Are you confused? Is you comprehension problem kicking in again? May I suggest a psychologist. I know a lot of liberals have been seeing them after the last election. Maybe you need to talk to someone. I hear it works wonders. Just an idea. God bless and have a nice day.

foundit66 · 08-18-2006, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

If there are no insults from me in this thread then why did you bring it up in this thread? Are you confused? Is you comprehension problem kicking in again? May I suggest a psychologist.

I was describing what you GENERALLY do.
There is no requirement for me to restrict my description to JUST what you do here.

There is no confusion. Just a ridiculous reply from you whereby you are AGAIN avoiding the issue.

But you know what is not confusing?

Each time you try to detract from the point, I will just repeat it...
So keep on replying and I'll keep pointing out what you're avoiding...

Why can't you just admit it that the DEMOCRATS support the troops health (head injuries) MORE THAN the Republicans do?

alias · 08-19-2006, 01:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by foundit66

I was describing what you GENERALLY do.
There is no requirement for me to restrict my description to JUST what you do here.

There is no confusion. Just a ridiculous reply from you whereby you are AGAIN avoiding the issue.

But you know what is not confusing?

Each time you try to detract from the point, I will just repeat it...
So keep on replying and I'll keep pointing out what you're avoiding...

Why can't you just admit it that the DEMOCRATS support the troops health (head injuries) MORE THAN the Republicans do?

Keep your comments to the thread and not to what you think I generally do. I just read your comments in aother thread calling Jefferson's comments stupid and then you saying "who the fuck do you think you are". That makes you a hypocrite.

I will not admit the democrats support the troops health more than the republicans. If they truely supported the troops health, they would stop doing all they can to undermine the troops efforts in fighting the enemy by trying to prosecute soldiers for killing civilians who the soldiers happen to believe are the enemy. You and the democrats want the soldiers to fight a politically correct war and you want to tie one hand behind their back and put restrictions on our soldiers while there are none on the enemy. I call that harming our soldier's health more than caring about their health.

foundit66 · 08-19-2006, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

Keep your comments to the thread and not to what you think I generally do. I just read your comments in aother thread calling Jefferson's comments stupid and then you saying "who the fuck do you think you are". That makes you a hypocrite.

How do you figure that....

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

I will not admit the democrats support the troops health more than the republicans. If they truely supported the troops health, they would stop doing all they can to undermine the troops efforts in fighting the enemy by trying to prosecute soldiers for killing civilians who the soldiers happen to believe are the enemy.

1) You're changing the subject again...
2) Prosecuting potential war crimes is not "undermining the troops.

Quote:

Originally Posted by alias

You and the democrats want the soldiers to fight a politically correct war and you want to tie one hand behind their back and put restrictions on our soldiers while there are none on the enemy. I call that harming our soldier's health more than caring about their health.

The restrictings being...
... that they shouldn't be killing civilians?

Hate to break it to you, but THAT restriction is going to stay in place. Not even the Congressional Republicans are trying change that...

And, once again, you have avoided the ACTUAL SUBJECT matter.
Why can't you just admit it that the DEMOCRATS support the troops health regarding head injuries MORE THAN the Republicans do?

alias · 08-19-2006, 06:34 PM

What do you mean how do I figure you are a hypocrite? You are the one crying about me using insults when you do it yourself as I just showed by your own words to Jefferson. You're a hypocrite.