Defending the Truth
Earth
Click here for free registeration..
Quick Search
11/23/07 - Now offering premium membership for only $25.00!! Click here to get started.!

Go Back   Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Militaries and War
Militaries and War Debate and discuss global militaries, past and present wars including the war on terror.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-22-2006, 09:06 PM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,665
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

Points: 25,380, Level: 96
Points: 25,380, Level: 96 Points: 25,380, Level: 96 Points: 25,380, Level: 96
Level up: 97%, 970 Points needed
Level up: 97% Level up: 97% Level up: 97%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%

Talk of Talk is Damaging.

There have probably been more articles and interviews in recent days advocating negotiations with Syria than Hizbullah has gunmen. Yet each of these statements does about as much damage as a terrorist. They make the West less able to respond to the current crisis while inspiring the radicals to be more intransigent.

Talks may be good in principle but in this context they are harmful. The problem is not that Syrian President Bashar Assad or the leaders of Hizbullah and Iran are bad guys or fanatics. The problem, in fact, is the exact opposite: they are acting rationally in pursuit of their interests. To paraphrase Bashar's cinematic equivalent, Michael Corleone in The Godfather, "It's not personal it's politics."

There are five basic reasons why the belief that negotiations with the Fabulously Extremist Four (Hamas, Hizbullah, Syria, and Iran) are going to solve anything is the opium of the opinion-makers.

1. They have far-reaching goals. They want a Middle East without Israel; a world without America; and a chador in every closet. These are not agrarian reformers: they are consistent totalitarians on a level with fascism and Communism.

2. They think they are winning. Even defeats are interpreted as victories, with some help from large portions of the Western media and intelligentsia. Especially now, they believe that the tide of history is running in their direction. Why should they be willing to make deals with those thought soon to be their victims?

3. They believe their enemies are weak and cowardly. Can you blame them? The calls for concessions, the demands for d tente, the nattering for negotiations are all taken by them as signs of weakness. Compromise is not a concept, at least right now, in their vocabulary.

4. All the assumptions made by the negotiate-now crowd (part of which is an appeasement-now crowd) are wrong.

THIS IS the point upon which I want to focus. The interests of Hizbullah, Hamas, Iran and Syria are in line with extremism and aggression, not moderation. These people are not deluded or merely aggrieved - they have a pretty good strategy going. Why shouldn't they sing, "The future belongs to me!"

If the appeasers win out, it will.....................follow the link for more of this story.

http://tinyurl.com/gsz3z
alias is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks
Digg del.icio.us StumbleUpon Google

Thread Tools
Display Modes






All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.

DefendingTheTruth.com RSS2 Feed   Add to Google   Add to My Yahoo!   Add to My MSN
 

SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Created by: Jon-Kingsbury.com
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.0 Release Candidate 2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Proudly hosted by WireNine


Recommended Sites

Top Political Sites Poltical Topsites