Defending the Truth
Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Militaries and War

Militaries and War Debate and discuss global militaries, past and present wars including the war on terror.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-16-2006, 08:30 AM   #71 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hkbajwa View Post
If you play by terrorist rules.. If you use terrorist actions to justify a terrorist response.. then you are no more than a terrorist.. You can only claim the moral high ground if your actions follow the moral high ground.
Yes, but there's also a point at which you say, "We're going to deal with this!"

If a mosque is filled with munitions, and the fundy terrorists are holed up in there, I say you take out the mosque. No question. And I'd say the same thing if I were a Catholic Priest and my church had been taken over by, and filled with violent gang members and their stock-piles of munitions.

Buildings can be replaced.
Sponsored Links
Old 09-16-2006, 09:18 AM   #72 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
chrisg967's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Gender: Female
Posts: 834
Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Level up: 52%, 73 Points needed
Level up: 52% Level up: 52% Level up: 52%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
chrisg967 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Hmm.... I don't suppose the issue of how to combat terrorists hiding in mosques, schools, hospitals, and other places of refuge has been discussed with the communities involved? Seems to me their input would be invaluable.

I agree that we cannot toss out the rules of war just because we have an unconventional enemy, because once we have done this, it would destroy whatever high moral ground we once stood upon. We need to remember to think about the consequences of our actions.
Old 09-16-2006, 12:16 PM   #73 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
No. You're not "discussing" it.
At least not "discussing" it in any way that constitutes a "discussion" to me.
You keep saying that you support killing them, but you do nothing to discuss the ACTUAL RULE we are talking about.

In fact, you have laid out rather interesting commentary on why we should "kill them" (as you put it), and I don't disagree that terrorists probably deserve death. I don't have any real problem with your "kill them" philosophy.

It's the "kill them WHEREVER" philosophy that gives me pause, and makes me wonder why we should mimic the worst of what terrorism has to offer.
Did you ever read a history book? We have always killed the enemy where we found them. It's called war. You can't defeat your enemy by giving him the advantage. That is what you are doing when you allow them to have sanctuaries. If America loses this war it will be directly because the bleeding hearts have caved in to the propaganda. Pure bullshit. Kill them where you find them. This moral high ground crap is for politicians. Soldiers fight wars, not politicians. Get the damn politics out of this fight and I assure you we will win. That is the goal.

Last edited by alias; 09-16-2006 at 12:20 PM.
Old 09-16-2006, 12:31 PM   #74 (permalink)
Community Leader
 
chrisg967's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Gender: Female
Posts: 834
Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39 Points: 3,877, Level: 39
Level up: 52%, 73 Points needed
Level up: 52% Level up: 52% Level up: 52%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
chrisg967 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
And soldiers are commanded by who? Hmm???
Old 09-16-2006, 01:12 PM   #75 (permalink)
Banned
 
Jefferson's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Omaha Beach
Posts: 7,298
Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92 Points: 21,921, Level: 92
Level up: 58%, 429 Points needed
Level up: 58% Level up: 58% Level up: 58%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Jefferson is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisg967 View Post
And soldiers are commanded by who? Hmm???
Their commanding officer.
Old 09-16-2006, 03:16 PM   #76 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucidthots View Post
I agree with not stealing from people.
Who ran the area before Israel was a nation?
Old 09-16-2006, 04:17 PM   #77 (permalink)
Senator
 
foundit66's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 5,836
Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86 Points: 18,394, Level: 86
Level up: 9%, 456 Points needed
Level up: 9% Level up: 9% Level up: 9%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
foundit66 is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by alias View Post
Did you ever read a history book? We have always killed the enemy where we found them. It's called war.
There exists a RULE regarding not killing the enemy in certain places, and you insist that it's not the case...
And instead of proving your claim, all you do is say "read a history book"...

You are frequently completely underwhelming in your pretense that blind contradiction is somehow convincing.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
You can't defeat your enemy by giving him the advantage. That is what you are doing when you allow them to have sanctuaries.
In all seriousness, you claim to have to have members of your family in the military, and that you "couldn't" serve.
Have you ever bothered to ask them about what you are advocating?

I realize they may agree with your sentiment, but the fact that the military law CONTRADICTS what you talk about is the part you should realize.


Quote:
Originally Posted by alias
If America loses this war it will be directly because the bleeding hearts have caved in to the propaganda. Pure bullshit. Kill them where you find them.
Yeah. Cause it's the LIBERALS who make the MILITARY policy about not killing people in cemetaries...
Frequently, you blame the bad on liberals and the good on conservatives, without even bothering to think what the real issue at hand is.
"(Gay marriage) is a debate about whether you think gay people are part of the human condition or just a random fetish."
-- Jon Stewart
"Please don't judge others by your own standards."
-- Garysher
Old 09-16-2006, 10:51 PM   #78 (permalink)
Congressional Representative
 
intangible child's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: California Dreamin
Posts: 3,391
Points: 21,555, Level: 92
Points: 21,555, Level: 92 Points: 21,555, Level: 92 Points: 21,555, Level: 92
Level up: 21%, 795 Points needed
Level up: 21% Level up: 21% Level up: 21%
Activity: 59%
Activity: 59% Activity: 59% Activity: 59%
intangible child is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisg967 View Post
Hmm.... I don't suppose the issue of how to combat terrorists hiding in mosques, schools, hospitals, and other places of refuge has been discussed with the communities involved? Seems to me their input would be invaluable.

I agree that we cannot toss out the rules of war just because we have an unconventional enemy, because once we have done this, it would destroy whatever high moral ground we once stood upon. We need to remember to think about the consequences of our actions.
http://www.defendingthetruth.com/mil...ions-bill.html
Live the Light, Give the Light,
Bring Heaven to Earth Every Day!


I am not a human being having a spiritual experience, I am a spiritual being having a human experience.

The ancient Greeks used to say, "You shall know a man by the friends that he keeps." Given the nature of their friends and advisers, what are we to conclude about the Republican party:
Stop the madness before us it stops!
Σταματήστε την τρέλα προτού να μας σταματήσεϊ Greek
Old 09-17-2006, 10:30 AM   #79 (permalink)
Council Member
 
hkbajwa's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pakistan
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,179
Points: 5,047, Level: 45
Points: 5,047, Level: 45 Points: 5,047, Level: 45 Points: 5,047, Level: 45
Level up: 49%, 103 Points needed
Level up: 49% Level up: 49% Level up: 49%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hkbajwa is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jefferson View Post
Yes, but there's also a point at which you say, "We're going to deal with this!"

If a mosque is filled with munitions, and the fundy terrorists are holed up in there, I say you take out the mosque. No question. And I'd say the same thing if I were a Catholic Priest and my church had been taken over by, and filled with violent gang members and their stock-piles of munitions.

Buildings can be replaced.
But you see the method of breaking your own rules of engagement ultimately works against you.

If americans were allowed to continue the treatment of prisoners in abu ghraib the feeling against them would have increased and as a result so would the resistance. More terrorists would ahve been created and america would be in an even bigger hole than it is.

Stick to the moral high ground and LIVE by those rules and you will see the fruits of your labor. 80 % of the animosity towards the US is a direct result of perceived hypocrisy.

You are probably right.. the US could wipe out everybody against them, but is the necessarily the best way to go about it? Winning people's hearts is better than defeating their souls.
Love for all, Hatred for none
Old 09-17-2006, 11:59 AM   #80 (permalink)
Banned
 
alias's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Wild Wild West
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,659
Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96 Points: 26,006, Level: 96
Level up: 66%, 344 Points needed
Level up: 66% Level up: 66% Level up: 66%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
alias is offline
Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by foundit66 View Post
There exists a RULE regarding not killing the enemy in certain places, and you insist that it's not the case...
And instead of proving your claim, all you do is say "read a history book"...

You are frequently completely underwhelming in your pretense that blind contradiction is somehow convincing.



In all seriousness, you claim to have to have members of your family in the military, and that you "couldn't" serve.
Have you ever bothered to ask them about what you are advocating?

I realize they may agree with your sentiment, but the fact that the military law CONTRADICTS what you talk about is the part you should realize.



Yeah. Cause it's the LIBERALS who make the MILITARY policy about not killing people in cemetaries...
Frequently, you blame the bad on liberals and the good on conservatives, without even bothering to think what the real issue at hand is.
These were not "people" in the cemetary. They were the enemy. If we had bombed all those idiots in the cemetary, who would be doing all the crying? Liberals or conservatives?

I love how you refuse to name the enemy. You keep referring to them as "citizens" or "people".

Last edited by alias; 09-17-2006 at 12:06 PM.
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:49 AM.


 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites