Defending the Truth

So what is this supposed to mean - other than that Cindy Sheehan has lost her mind?

You know one of these days, Ms Sheehan is going to have to explain why her son, who she values so much, re-enlisted while in Iraq. That is the one little stumbling block in her facade. She is against this war, yet the very son she mourns, supported it and showed his support by re-enlisting. That has got to be a tough one to explain away Cindy.

dmk

Sarge, The point of this post is to compare Cindy Sheehan's views to alias' post of Ann Coulter's opinion(what can I do....). They are exactly the same, just with opposing veiws. Anyone with radical values is bias. Thus, this post.

Are people still listening to her? Okay, she lost her son -- my sympathies. But, when she is openly supporting deserters, and hanging out with Hugo Chavez, I'm not going to listen to a fucking thing she has to say. She's a media whore.

Whoa there. What is the wide wide world of sports does Cindy Sheehan's mad lunatic rantings have anything to do with the Ann Coulter post about Muslims praying to Allah like the hijackers did on 09/11 and scaring the hell out of people? Please explain that one to me.

First of all, Cindy Sheehan does write fictious events(like the full page thank you notes that Ann Coulter post claims were taken out, and never were) to back her claims. Nor does she write things that are obviously hateful Muslim bashing. I use this example because every time someone mentions Cindy Sheehan it is about how her every word is 'mad lunatic rantings'. Lunatics start trouble in this world and that is exactly what anyone who rates a whole religious group as potentionally terroristic is doing. People like her just make this world more paranoid. The reason people are scared is because of people just like her(and I hate to say it, but you too, sometimes). They are both extremists, just on the opposite end of the scale.

Come on! Think about it. If she's obsessed with popularity and the media, supporting deserters and openly supporting Hugo Chavez would be some of the last things she would do. I highly doubt she thinks appearing radical and crazy is the best popularity poll booster.

She's an activist, and she's going on as if no weariness or insult could quench the fire that burns in her; she thinks she's fighting for justice for the death of her son. Whether or not Bush is responsible for the deaths of the American soldiers and the Iraqi citizens is a different debate. You guys want to play the game of analysis of this woman, so what matters here is that she believes that. She isn't insane or drunk with attention, she's just fighting for justice. If you genuinely thought that one of the people responsible for one of your close loved one's death was getting away with it, you would keep fighting too; perhaps even to the point of appearing radical.

All good points!

Are the reporters who reported the event scaring people also? Are you going to accuse the reporters and the airlines of scaring people needlessley?

The reason people are scared is because of islamofacism. Maybe if those reporters who are scaring people every day by reporting what is happening would just quit reporting, then nobody would be scared. Yeah, that's it. Sounds like you have really thought about this a lot.