Defending the Truth

Articles | Interviews | Politicians | Groups | Arcade | Experience | Donate
  Defending the Truth > Debate Politics > Militaries and War
Unjust War??

Militaries and War Debate and discuss global militaries, past and present wars including the war on terror.

Reply
Page 4 of 4 < 123 4
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-21-2005, 10:28 PM   #31 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,491
Country:
Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Level up: 89%, 113 Points needed
Level up: 89% Level up: 89% Level up: 89%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
A threat to national interests. Our interests include our allies. What part of that do you not understand. Am I talking over your head???? Saddam was a threat to not only his neighbors, some of which were our allies, but to his own people as well.

dmk

That still does not address the lies about a connection to 9/11 and WMD's. You are fixing the facts after the fact just like a good lapdog.
Saddam was connected to 9/11 in the same way that Hitler was connected to Pearl Harbor.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Sponsored Links
Old 09-21-2005, 10:44 PM   #32 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
A threat to national interests. Our interests include our allies. What part of that do you not understand. Am I talking over your head???? Saddam was a threat to not only his neighbors, some of which were our allies, but to his own people as well.

dmk

That still does not address the lies about a connection to 9/11 and WMD's. You are fixing the facts after the fact just like a good lapdog.
Saddam was connected to 9/11 in the same way that Hitler was connected to Pearl Harbor.
The point is that Saddam supported militant Islam and since it was thought that he had WMD, there was NO reason to assume that he wouldn't pass some of it on to OBL's network.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-21-2005, 10:49 PM   #33 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,491
Country:
Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Level up: 89%, 113 Points needed
Level up: 89% Level up: 89% Level up: 89%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
Quote:
Originally Posted by sgtdmski
A threat to national interests. Our interests include our allies. What part of that do you not understand. Am I talking over your head???? Saddam was a threat to not only his neighbors, some of which were our allies, but to his own people as well.

dmk

That still does not address the lies about a connection to 9/11 and WMD's. You are fixing the facts after the fact just like a good lapdog.
Saddam was connected to 9/11 in the same way that Hitler was connected to Pearl Harbor.
The point is that Saddam supported militant Islam and since it was thought that he had WMD, there was NO reason to assume that he wouldn't pass some of it on to OBL's network.

Well since there is NO CONNECTION between Saddam and Al-Qaeda I would say that it is a wrong assumption. And the UN inspectors knew there were no WMD's.

This war is in no way justifible.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 09-21-2005, 11:23 PM   #34 (permalink)
Block Captain
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 384
Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38 Points: 3,726, Level: 38
Level up: 51%, 74 Points needed
Level up: 51% Level up: 51% Level up: 51%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Steven M is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
And the UN inspectors knew there were no WMD's.

This war is in no way justifible.
They couldn't know that Saddam didn't have WMDs. To prove something like that, they would have to cover every square inch of Iraq, and that would only be the surface. As some people say, "you can't prove a negative."[/u]
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. ~Edmund Burke
Old 09-22-2005, 06:16 AM   #35 (permalink)
Head of Security
Moderator
 
tadpole256's Avatar
Join Date: May 2005
Location: The Cradle of Liberty
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,854
Country:
Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100 Points: 54,633, Level: 100
Level up: 0%, 0 Points needed
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Send a message via AIM to tadpole256 Send a message via Yahoo to tadpole256 Send a message via Skype™ to tadpole256
tadpole256 is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
And the UN inspectors knew there were no WMD's.

This war is in no way justifible.
They couldn't know that Saddam didn't have WMDs. To prove something like that, they would have to cover every square inch of Iraq, and that would only be the surface. As some people say, "you can't prove a negative."
Dude... Take a math class. You can prove a negative. And it's like a court of law, they only have to prove it 'beyond a reasonable doubt'. I think they clearly did that. Why do all of you republicans support this bullshit war so strongly? What do you get out of it? Do you secretly hate soldiers?
Fight the good fight, and die with the enemy's heart in your hand.

http://www.armysailor.com
http://www.tadpolenet.com/techblog
------------------------------------
Check out my latest addition to the blogosphere
Quixotic Journey
Old 09-22-2005, 08:45 AM   #36 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,491
Country:
Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Level up: 89%, 113 Points needed
Level up: 89% Level up: 89% Level up: 89%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven M
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
And the UN inspectors knew there were no WMD's.

This war is in no way justifible.
They couldn't know that Saddam didn't have WMDs. To prove something like that, they would have to cover every square inch of Iraq, and that would only be the surface. As some people say, "you can't prove a negative."[/u]
UN inspectors covered all of Iraq and knew there were no weapons because it knew the countries inner workings. That is why Hans Blix nearly shit a brick when Bush started lying.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Old 09-25-2005, 12:39 AM   #37 (permalink)
Website Owner
Administrator
 
RidinHighSpeeds's Avatar
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Taxachusetts
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,944
Country:
Thanks: 11
Thanked 63 Times in 55 Posts
Send a message via AIM to RidinHighSpeeds
RidinHighSpeeds is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
UN inspectors covered all of Iraq and knew there were no weapons because it knew the countries inner workings. That is why Hans Blix nearly shit a brick when Bush started lying.
The UN also did a good job with the Oil for Food program.
Networked Web Sites
Jon-Kingsbury.com
DefendingTheTruth
UML Forums
Old 09-25-2005, 12:45 AM   #38 (permalink)
Super Moderator
Moderator
 
hevusa's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Seattle (grew up around D.C.)
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,491
Country:
Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97 Points: 27,237, Level: 97
Level up: 89%, 113 Points needed
Level up: 89% Level up: 89% Level up: 89%
Activity: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
hevusa is offline 		Reply With Quote
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RidinHighSpeeds
Quote:
Originally Posted by hevusa
UN inspectors covered all of Iraq and knew there were no weapons because it knew the countries inner workings. That is why Hans Blix nearly shit a brick when Bush started lying.
The UN also did a good job with the Oil for Food program.
Corruption certainly can occur, but should we throw out the baby with the bath water? The corruption in America is pretty evident but I don't think it discredits the entire thing.

Bush certainly proved that the UN was not lying in regards to WMD's.
--- help me Instant Runoff Voting, you're my only hope ---

"There is no such thing as laziness. Laziness is only lack of incentive." Norman Reider, MD

Morality is not contingent on religion to exist. Therefore religion only detracts from the purity of morality.
Reply
Page 4 of 4 < 123 4

Bookmarks

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools
Display Modes
Linear Mode Linear Mode



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:47 PM.

Defending the Truth - FAQ - Contact Us - Donate - Archive - Top

 Top Political Sites
Poltical Topsites 

Recommended Sites