So I've seen my 20th and final report on Barack Obama on CNN and other media outlets that seem so quick to label him "Jesus Christ superstar" It kinda makes me sick to my stomach how we really glow toward people. I still don't know how he is a change candidate. Why is he change? Because he can speak well? Because he's new to the political system? Why? Correct me if I'm wrong but wouldn't a woman president be more historical than having the first african american president. Excuse me, the first halfrican american president. I used to like Obama. I liked his laid back personna and his knack for saying the right things to the right people at the right time. But lately his arrogance has rubbed me the wrong way. I do no consider him the only change candidate. I think he needs to do away with that card because it will soon cause him to be dealt a bad hand. He is not change. He's nowhere near the change that Hilary Clinton is and I'm not even voting for Hilary and I can tell you that she's much more of a change than he is. He basing his "change" gimmick on the fact that George H. Bush was in office. Then Bill Clinton, then George W. Bush, so in order to have change we don't need Hilary in office and he's the only candidate to bring that change. Spell is out with me:B-U-L-L-S-H-I-T

Barack Obama needs to put down the ego juice and realize that you can't win over people with just big speeches and Oprah(although with all the liberals out there sippin on his kool-aid he probably will) You also can't win over people when you say I'm change and you never seem to lay out how you are change or what you stand for and what your against.

I know CNN and MSNBC love Barack Obama and they swoon over him and they hang on his every word but I mean come on, are liberals that desperate for a far-left guy that bad? The left is craving a secular progressive society that much that they aren't even worried about someone with experience or toughness. Heres a tip for the kool-aid sippers on the left. If you want someone that supports your views(no matter how rediculous and whacked out they may be) and has the experience to go along with it then pick John Edwards.

He's probably the best fit for our country. He has the best of both worlds.
He has the change of Barack Obama and the experience of Hilary Clinton.
John Edwards may be the most central candidate we have on either side.
And as a moderate independent I'm supporting Edwards.

You don't hear Barack or Hilary talking about fighting to bring back the middle class. You don't hear Barack talk about shoving big business out of Washington. He just wants to push the politicians out. He doesn't touch the fact that big companies play politicians like puppets. I guess if he went after big business he'd have to take out his gal pal Oprah and she wouldn't have that.

So to all the radical-left brats that are waving their hands in praise and jumping for joy because "The Great Barack" has arrived. For the rest of us in the middle(however many of us are still in existance)living in Real World US, we can prepare for far-left ideology hitting us like nuclear warheads. I think I can hear Neo-Cons shaking in their boots. Secular Progressive radicals are starting up the "Anti Tank", and those of us in the reasonable, rational middle, well, we can only pray that we don't get fucked worse than we did when Bush Part II and his band of Conservative flunkies ruled the day.

A Vote for Obama is a vote for Anti-American, Secular Progressive, Socialist hell. Not to mention friend chicken and greens at the White House Holiday Dinners.