Yes.
You have SAID you are - by lying to the American Red Cross.

Unless, of course, that is another of your sick and stupid lies.

Either way, you're just a butt-stupid liar.

And again your reference to a horse's ass...

Your lover's ass not doing it for you any more?

Maybe you could go lie to the Red Cross again.

Does that turn you on?

I don't need to twist anything.

What you are too perverted, and too far gone, to understand is that NORMAL INTELLIGENT PEOPLE ARE NOT AMUSED BY YOUR SELFISH, SICK BEHAVIOR.

Ahh. Thanks for the correction.

I also disagree with it. I know there are some concerns regarding willingness to test ones self if there are requirements such as this, but quite frankly I don't understand such a perspective and find it irrational. I don't fully appreciate why we should cater to such irrationality.

If you have the disease, it's best to know and work to get treated. Staying ignorant gains you nothing of substance, IMO.

I have sex in a monogamous relationship with my partner of five years.
So what is the "risk" for HIV from my blood?

Oh wait. I'm gay and that's all that needs to be known, right?


Why?
Because I'm gay?

Man. I'm getting a REAL KICK about how you claim not to be prejudiced against gays, but then you CONTINUALLY lump us all into one group like there is no difference amongst us.

And for the record, I don't "lie to the American Red Cross".
But please. Don't let the truth stop you in your prejudicial stereo-typing judgments.

I am gay, so I must be lying, eh?


My point was simple. And I'm not surprised that you completely avoided it, or completely misunderstood it.
I acknowledge SOME forms of cancer are preventable. And like AIDS, they should be prevented.
But for those forms of cancer which are not, I feel that they should be fought tooth and nail. And I support the funding we give them.

But please. Continue to make allegations regarding situations I never even hinted at...
No. Scratch that. I DIRECTLY REFUTED the spreading crap when I talked about how much I thought the law should be used against people who spread the disease.
So make my statement: "Don't let my ACTUALLY EXPLAINED position contradict your lies on what your "questions" allege my position is..."


Does Tristan have HIV?

Oh. Silly me. That was just you deceitfully misrepresenting me again, weren't you.


If I were a cop, I could stop every black person I see in the interests of preventing crime.
That wouldn't make it intelligent or right.

The Red Cross does have a goal, but their efforts are too broad. Irrationally so.
I have been in a monogamous gay relationship for five years. What are my risks for HIV?

And for a heterosexual married couple, if the husband might be frequenting prostitutes, what is their risk for HIV?


Can you prove that?
I've been trying to find research on that, and have been unsuccessful.
Can you prove your claim?


Here we go again with more of your crap.
I don't lie to the Red Cross.

But please. Continue to act like an idiot by continuing to claim that I do for the next 15 to 30 posts.


Further evidence of why homosexuality CONTINUES to be seen as such a blight. It's the thinking, and behavior, of homosexuals who think they're "above the law".[/quote]


Translation?
Jefferson has absolutely NO CLUE as to what I actually said.
Of course, he'll just start blasting away and never answer this question, but I'll try anyways.
Jefferson? What do you THINK I was saying?
And please review the ENTIRE paragraph, with context, before you answer and make yourself look even more foolish.

Once again, you're arguing against a position I don't even have.


Hey Jefferson.
Did you ever figure out that what you THOUGHT "hate crimes" were was NOT what "hate crimes" actually are?
Never mind. I'm being too optimistic...